2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0895-4356(03)00110-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Should meta-analysts search Embase in addition to Medline?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
86
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 144 publications
(87 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
86
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A manual search of Spine, European Spine Journal, and the American and British versions of Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, as well as the reference lists of the selected studies was conducted to identify further articles. Though Embase was not accessible, we assumed that there would be few additional references when a comprehensive search in the abovementioned databases combined with a hand search was conducted (35).…”
Section: Search Strategy and Inclusion/exclusion Criteriamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A manual search of Spine, European Spine Journal, and the American and British versions of Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, as well as the reference lists of the selected studies was conducted to identify further articles. Though Embase was not accessible, we assumed that there would be few additional references when a comprehensive search in the abovementioned databases combined with a hand search was conducted (35).…”
Section: Search Strategy and Inclusion/exclusion Criteriamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is not clear, however, whether a search limited to Medline might bias estimates of treatment benefit [13], provided the rest of the search is comprehensive. From our results in asymptomatic patients, the diagnostic OR is very little or marginally influenced by the number of databases searched.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Few authors have shown that searching Embase and Pascal Biomed could complement Medline in the field of randomized clinical trials [8][9][10][11][12][13]. Topfer [9] has compared literature searches for devices in Embase and Medline, however, all devices included in this study had therapeutic uses.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We had no access to Embase and assumed it would provide few additional references if a comprehensive retrieval was performed in the aforementioned databases. 39 The search strategy combined the terms clazosentan, endothelin receptor antagonists, endothelins crossed with subarachnoid hemorrhage, intracranial aneurysm, or intracranial vasospasm. We restricted the search to human studies and clinical trials.…”
Section: Literature Searchmentioning
confidence: 99%