2007
DOI: 10.1007/bf03085975
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Should more hospitals in the Netherlands provide PCI without on-site cardiac surgery?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the Netherlands, hospitals are reasonably well reimbursed for PCI procedures(Zijlstra and de Boer, 2007), supply regulation by the government protects the incumbent PCI hospitals against entry of new competitors, and all hospitals are not-for-profit by law.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the Netherlands, hospitals are reasonably well reimbursed for PCI procedures(Zijlstra and de Boer, 2007), supply regulation by the government protects the incumbent PCI hospitals against entry of new competitors, and all hospitals are not-for-profit by law.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ten years ago, the expansion of off-site primary PCI centres in the Netherlands sparked reactions, from both supporters and opponents [ 25 , 26 ]. Our results showed off-site PCI centres improve accessibility to PCI care.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… High versus low volume centres: volume and outcome may translate into different outcomes and sicker patients may be presented more often to large volume centres [ 5 , 6 ]. Operator skills, mode of vascular access (femoral versus radial route), procedural time, availability of advanced technology and surgical stand-by may all play an important role and are usually not included as a variable, when it comes to comparison of outcome [ 12 ]. Despite the shortest time delay, patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) have the highest mortality [ 19 ].…”
Section: Important Issuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Operator skills, mode of vascular access (femoral versus radial route), procedural time, availability of advanced technology and surgical stand-by may all play an important role and are usually not included as a variable, when it comes to comparison of outcome [ 12 ].…”
Section: Important Issuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation