2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2007.03.038
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Should naevus sebaceus be excised prophylactically? A clinical audit

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
24
0
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
24
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In the past, the malignant potential of sebaceous nevi has been overestimated. 96,97 Their surgical removal may be considered for cosmetic and psychosocial reasons but, according to present knowledge, cancer prophylaxis cannot be taken as a rationale to remove such nevi. Numerous earlier reported ''basal cell carcinomas'' may in fact have been trichoblastomas.…”
Section: Schimmelpenning Syndromementioning
confidence: 98%
“…In the past, the malignant potential of sebaceous nevi has been overestimated. 96,97 Their surgical removal may be considered for cosmetic and psychosocial reasons but, according to present knowledge, cancer prophylaxis cannot be taken as a rationale to remove such nevi. Numerous earlier reported ''basal cell carcinomas'' may in fact have been trichoblastomas.…”
Section: Schimmelpenning Syndromementioning
confidence: 98%
“…For this reason, NSJ should be managed with surgery before the period of puberty, as was proposed in many reports [48,49]. CO 2 lasers [50] enhance cosmesis, but can only reach the papillary dermis, therefore they are not recommended because of the possibility of malignant degeneration of the remaining cells in the lower dermis [51].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most are present at birth, although some emerge in early childhood. It is an uncommon birthmark, occurring in 0.3% of all neonates, and is more common in females [3]. The natural history of the lesion demonstrates evolution, following the typical differentiation of normal sebaceous glands.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%