2016
DOI: 10.1097/mpg.0000000000001014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Should Partial Hydrolysates Be Used as Starter Infant Formula? A Working Group Consensus

Abstract: Partially hydrolyzed formulas (pHFs) are increasingly used worldwide, both in the prevention of atopic disease in at-risk infants and in the therapeutic management of infants with functional gastrointestinal manifestations. Because prevention is always preferable to treatment, we reviewed the literature aiming to find an answer for the question whether pHF may be recommended for feeding all infants if breast-feeding is not possible. PubMed and Cochrane databases were searched up to December 2014. In addition, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
35
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 102 publications
1
35
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…A working group consensus concluded the paucity of data unables to recommend pHF for every infants as second choice for infant feeding when breastfeeding is not possible. 38 In this nationwide cohort, the use of pHF-HA at 2 months was not associated with a lower risk of any of the studied allergy-related symptoms up to 2 years and was even associated with a higher risk of wheezing, FA, and, to a lesser extent, eczema. These findings must be confirmed in other studies worldwide but raise questions about the harmlessness of the largescale pHF use and contribute to the debate around the accuracy of recommending pHF as a way of preventing allergy development in non-breastfed at-risk infant.…”
Section: Con Clus Ionmentioning
confidence: 60%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A working group consensus concluded the paucity of data unables to recommend pHF for every infants as second choice for infant feeding when breastfeeding is not possible. 38 In this nationwide cohort, the use of pHF-HA at 2 months was not associated with a lower risk of any of the studied allergy-related symptoms up to 2 years and was even associated with a higher risk of wheezing, FA, and, to a lesser extent, eczema. These findings must be confirmed in other studies worldwide but raise questions about the harmlessness of the largescale pHF use and contribute to the debate around the accuracy of recommending pHF as a way of preventing allergy development in non-breastfed at-risk infant.…”
Section: Con Clus Ionmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…A working group consensus concluded the paucity of data unables to recommend pHF for every infants as second choice for infant feeding when breastfeeding is not possible . In this nationwide cohort, the use of pHF‐HA at 2 months was not associated with a lower risk of any of the studied allergy‐related symptoms up to 2 years and was even associated with a higher risk of wheezing, FA, and, to a lesser extent, eczema.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…However, available data do not indicate that pHFs are potentially harmful for healthy, term infants. Based on limited available data, summarized elsewhere, the use of pHF in healthy infants is safe with regard to growth [35]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Three studies considered the effects of protein-hydrolysed formula (Mennella et al, 2011;Roche et al, 1993;Rzehak et al, 2009), in which the protein has been either partially or extensively broken down into smaller peptides (Vandenplas et al, 2016) on weight gain. An RCT found infants (n = 250) fed extensively hydrolysed casein formula had a lower BMI (WHO Multicentre Growth Reference population [2006] charts) growth to 11 months than those fed partially hydrolysed whey 2 One paper involves exposure variables in both the nutrient profile and parent feeding practices section and is included in the parent feeding practice table (Table 3).…”
Section: Protein-hydrolysed Formulamentioning
confidence: 99%