2013
DOI: 10.1245/s10434-013-3206-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Should Re-excision Lumpectomy Rates Be a Quality Measure in Breast-Conserving Surgery?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The concept of discussing chemotherapy sequencing during shared decision making with the patient as a method to lower reoperations should not contribute to the unintended consequences that have been attributed to other initiatives aimed at lowering ROR, such as larger lumpectomies, worse cosmetic outcomes, and increased mastectomy rates from surgeon risk aversion, a fear of being penalized for a reoperation if the surgeon is participating in a quality improvement program 25. It could even be postulated that better cosmetic outcomes might result from smaller lumpectomies for patients demonstrating a good clinical response to NAC.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The concept of discussing chemotherapy sequencing during shared decision making with the patient as a method to lower reoperations should not contribute to the unintended consequences that have been attributed to other initiatives aimed at lowering ROR, such as larger lumpectomies, worse cosmetic outcomes, and increased mastectomy rates from surgeon risk aversion, a fear of being penalized for a reoperation if the surgeon is participating in a quality improvement program 25. It could even be postulated that better cosmetic outcomes might result from smaller lumpectomies for patients demonstrating a good clinical response to NAC.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Increased mastectomy rates and poor cosmetic outcomes are potential unintended adverse outcomes of efforts to lower reoperation rates and therefore should be monitored. 40 42 These risks were recognized but were felt to be balanced by the potential to improve overall patient care by following conference recommendations. There is evidence that both reoperation rate and cosmetic outcome can improve by adoption of oncoplastic techniques.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent efforts to standardize the approach to addressing pathologic margin status also have the potential to effect reoperation rates 45 . Although no clear single solution has emerged, high variability suggests this intervention could be a useful quality measure 7,11,12 , or at least a factor that affects patient satisfaction and cost 46,47 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%