Should socialists be republicans?

Kandiyali, Jan

doi:10.1080/13698230.2022.2070834

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Introduction1

Citation Types

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Year Published

2023

2024

Publication Types

Select...

Article4

Book1

Relationship

Self Cite0

Independent5

Authors

Journals

Cited by 5 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 42 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The radical republican claim has gone mostly unchallenged. A few raise concerns about radical republicanism , suggesting that republican concern with domination does not fit well with radical politics (Kandiyali 2022). Others take issue with radical republicanism, arguing that republicans need not align with radical ends (for example, Frye 2020; Taylor 2019).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Domination at Work: Resisting the Radical Diagnosis

Frye

2023

Brit. J. Polit. Sci.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Political theorists and philosophers have converged mainly on the following claim: workers face the threat of domination in the workplace. While many propose reforms to capitalism to address this domination, a growing chorus of radical Republicans argue that domination at work results from the capitalist distribution of ownership. In this paper, I argue that this focus on ownership is a mistake. Instead, I contend we ought to direct our attention to the role that managerial discretion plays in the firm's structure. My intention in advancing these two claims is to carve out space for a position that acknowledges the domination of workers, but does so in a way that is compatible with private ownership in the means of production.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%