2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.euroecorev.2014.10.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Should tax policy favor high- or low-productivity firms?

Abstract: Heterogeneous firm productivity seems to provide an argument for governments to pursue 'pick-the-winner' strategies by subsidizing highly productive firms more, or taxing them less, than their less productive counterparts. We appraise this argument by studying the optimal choice of effective tax rates in an oligopolistic industry with heterogeneous firms. We show that the optimal structure of tax differentiation depends critically on the feasible level of corporate profit taxes, which in turn depends on the de… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At microlevel, tax reforms may impact productivity (Foss, Mudambi, & Murtinu, 2019). The literature on the relationship between taxes and TFP (Langenmayr, Haufler, & Bauer, 2015; Schwellnus & Arnold, 2008) shows that taxes hinder TFP across firm sizes and ages. If this negative effect would be more pronounced for technology ventures (like those included in this study) that are on a promising trajectory toward the technological frontier, such an effect would be policy relevant not only for its micro implications in terms of TFP reduction, but also for a hindered reallocation of resources and market shares across industries and firms, which has been proved to push aggregate country‐level productivity (Auerbach & Hines, 2002).…”
Section: Tax Shifts and Firm Productivitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At microlevel, tax reforms may impact productivity (Foss, Mudambi, & Murtinu, 2019). The literature on the relationship between taxes and TFP (Langenmayr, Haufler, & Bauer, 2015; Schwellnus & Arnold, 2008) shows that taxes hinder TFP across firm sizes and ages. If this negative effect would be more pronounced for technology ventures (like those included in this study) that are on a promising trajectory toward the technological frontier, such an effect would be policy relevant not only for its micro implications in terms of TFP reduction, but also for a hindered reallocation of resources and market shares across industries and firms, which has been proved to push aggregate country‐level productivity (Auerbach & Hines, 2002).…”
Section: Tax Shifts and Firm Productivitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 An exception is Langenmayr et al (2015), who study incentives to dierentially tax high-and low-productivity rms, and nd that depending on the extent of prot-shifting opportunities, it may be optimal to discriminate in favor of either type of rm. As in much of the heterogeneous rms tax literature, their analysis emphasizes a corrective role for tax policies in the presence of imperfect competition.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other models that introduce corporate taxation and imperfect deductibility areHaufler and Runkel (2012),Bauer et al (2014),Koethenbuerger and Stimmelmayr (2014),Langenmayr et al (2015),Irlacher and Unger (2018), and Bond and Gresik (2018).11 Note that marginal costs for the core variety m = 0 are given by v(0, c) = c, which implies that c hf = v hf .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%