Should We Be Using Just ‘Typical’ Weather Data in Building Performance Simulation?

Abstract

Over the past 40 years, organizations worldwide have created weather data sets specifically for use in building energy simulation, usually called typical or reference years. Crawley (1998) showed how a variety of typical data sets compare in terms of impacts on building energy. This study found that TRY-type files (single years) do not represent the period of record well and recommends TMY or other weather data created using similar procedures, such as European test reference years. Several other studies have concluded that TMY are good enough to represent typical building operation. Yet we need weather that represents a reasonable range of climate conditions that buildings experience. A 2015 study proposed development of eXtreme Meteorological Year (XMY) weather files to represent the range of climate conditions that buildings may experience. An XMY starts with the same period of record as the TMY, but the methodology purposely selects more extreme months. This paper proposes a new regime for climatic data representation in buildings-an XMY or eXtreme Meteorological Year. We demonstrate how several sets of international typical meteorological data sets compare to the actual period of record that they represent. Then using prototype buildings, we show that the climatic response of the building would be better served by a range of building climatic data, investigating high and low cases of temperature, humidity, solar radiation and wind conditions.

Updated Typical Weather Years for the Energy Simulation of Buildings in Mediterranean Climate. A Case Study for Sicily

“…Bevilacqua et al highlighted that simulated heating and cooling load for a building equipped with a green roof in Southern Italy may vary by around 30% and 15%, respectively, when adopting weather files based on two consecutive actual years [55]. This suggests that further investigation is needed to develop case-dependent weighting sets in order to minimize the distance with the average multi-year simulation results [9,25,29,39,48].…”

Overcoming the incumbency and barriers to sustainable cooling

“…For adaptation-based policies, it is important to promote tools that focus on future climate conditions and not only on average historical weather data, known as typical meteorological year (TMY) weather (Crawley et al 2019). 4 Currently, existing procedures promoted by building regulations to calculate and size thermal systems of buildings do not match future, even existing, thermal needs (Siu & Liao 2020).…”

Prototyping a digital twin – a case study of a ‘U-shaped’ military building

“…In order to calibrate the assumptions of a predictive model and verify the efficacy of the energy simulation, a climatic station and sensors will be installed on one of the building, or 'should we be using just "Typical" weather data in building performance simulation?' [29]. The gap will be used to compare a created digital twin based either on sensors or a dynamic algorithm input in order to find a best convergent baseline between digital and real world, using different weather data input [30,31,32].…”