2015
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2646326
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Should We Go One Step Further? An Accurate Comparison of One-Step and Two-Step Procedures in a Generalized Method of Moments Framework

Abstract: According to the conventional asymptotic theory, the two-step Generalized Method of Moments (GMM) estimator and test perform as least as well as the one-step estimator and test in large samples. The conventional asymptotic theory, as elegant and convenient as it is, completely ignores the estimation uncertainty in the weighting matrix, and as a result it may not re ‡ect …nite sample situations well. In this paper, we employ the …xed-smoothing asymptotic theory that accounts for the estimation uncertainty, and … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We particularly use system GMM rather than difference GMM as the former provides a more precise estimation addressing the problems of unit root property (Bond, 2002). Further, we use two-step estimation, as it has smaller asymptotic variance in comparison to one-step estimation (Hwang and Sun, 2018). To test the validity of the instrument and over-identifying restrictions in GMM dynamic model estimation, the Sargan test is used.…”
Section: Definition Of Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We particularly use system GMM rather than difference GMM as the former provides a more precise estimation addressing the problems of unit root property (Bond, 2002). Further, we use two-step estimation, as it has smaller asymptotic variance in comparison to one-step estimation (Hwang and Sun, 2018). To test the validity of the instrument and over-identifying restrictions in GMM dynamic model estimation, the Sargan test is used.…”
Section: Definition Of Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In finite sample, g n (θ 0 ) = 0 because g n (θ) = 0 for all θ, and this causes extra variations through the terms in (24) and (26). Similar to the Windmeijer correction, by taking into account for these (asymptotically negligible) terms in estimating the variance we can make more accurate inference.…”
Section: Assume Thatmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… See Hwang and Sun (2018) for a detailed comparison between one‐step and two‐step GMM estimators. …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%