2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2020.105173
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Should we recommend occipital plate fixation using bicortical screws or inverted occipital hooks to optimize occipito-cervical junction fusion? A biomechanical study combining an experimental and analytical approach.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(4 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another limitation of the hook implant is the lack of personalization. It is known that a mismatch between hook and bone thickness can limit the stability of the implant [ 8 ]. Due to the inadequate anatomical adaptation of the hook to the bone structure can slip off from the foramen magnum and lead to a loss of the observed biomechanical advantages.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Another limitation of the hook implant is the lack of personalization. It is known that a mismatch between hook and bone thickness can limit the stability of the implant [ 8 ]. Due to the inadequate anatomical adaptation of the hook to the bone structure can slip off from the foramen magnum and lead to a loss of the observed biomechanical advantages.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Concentrating on the occipital part of the implants, instrumentation of this area represents a challenge for the surgeon due to its anatomical peculiarities [ 4 , 5 , 6 ]. The occipital protuberance is its thickest bony part, but the thickness is not uniform and gradually decreases laterally and caudally [ 7 ], so that in some settings even the shortest provided screws may be too long or the length of the screw would not provide sufficient stability [ 8 ]. Many occipital implants have been proposed, but no consensus has yet been reached [ 4 , 8 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations