Should we reframe how we think about physical activity and sedentary behaviour measurement? Validity and reliability reconsidered

Abstract

BackgroundThe measurement of physical activity (PA) and sedentary behaviour (SB) is fundamental to health related research, policy, and practice but there are well known challenges to these measurements. Within the academic literature, the terms “validity” and “reliability” are frequently used when discussing PA and SB measurement to reassure the reader that they can trust the evidence.DiscussionIn this paper we argue that a lack of consensus about the best way to define, assess, or utilize the concepts of validity and reliability has led to inconsistencies and confusion within the PA and SB evidence base. Where possible we propose theoretical examples and solutions. Moreover we present an overarching framework (The Edinburgh Framework) which we believe will provide a process or pathway to help researchers and practitioners consider validity and reliability in a standardized way.ConclusionFurther work is required to identify all necessary and available solutions and generate consensus in our field to develop the Edinburgh Framework into a useful practical resource. We envisage that ultimately the proposed framework will benefit research, practice, policy, and teaching. We welcome critique, rebuttal, comment, and discussion on all ideas presented.

Adding exercise or subtracting sitting time for glycaemic control: where do we stand?

“…Thus, it could be debated whether determining and matching energy expenditure is a realistic and ideal philosophy in studies that aim to reduce and interrupt sitting time-when the assessment of relevant behaviours (e.g. sitting, standing and stepping of various intensities) and their specific contexts may be of more relevance [17]. With this in mind, the integration of data from multiple devices that are able to accurately capture context, posture and activity patterning/intensity in real-time could be emphasised in future research.…”

Parent-child behavioural patterns related to pre-schoolers' overweight/obesity

“…From the above-mentioned correlates of overweight/obesity among pre-schoolers, the objective measurement of overweight/obesity in parents and children is methodologically relatively simple and accurate, while the measurement of free-living PA, sedentary behaviour, or eating habits is more complicated and methodologically diverse (Kelly, Fitzsimons, & Baker, 2016). Previous comprehensive studies of energy balance-related behaviours in preschool children from six European countries (Belgium, Bulgaria, Germany, Greece, Poland, and Spain) (Cardon et al, 2016;De Craemer, Lateva, et al, 2015; used objectively measured overweight status, PA measured by pedometers, and parents' proxy-reported questionnaires for assessing the sedentary behaviour and dietary habits of pre-schoolers (Cardon et al, 2016).…”

Accelerometer data treatment for adolescents: Fitting a piece of the puzzle

“…Understanding these relationships can guide intervention development and evaluationand inform health promotion messages. Accelerometry is the method of choice to gain an unbiased, objective understanding of PA (Kelly et al, 2016). This technology facilitates the sensitive collection of movement data accumulated over specified epochs, enabling the calculation of time spent in differing activity intensities (e.g., moderate-tovigorous PA, MVPA).…”