2018
DOI: 10.1111/1754-9485.12743
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Should we screen for brain metastases in non‐small cell lung cancer?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Considering that these markers are not specific to BM pathology, they cannot replace MRI but can complement it by aiding in prioritizing MRI scans for those at higher risk of BM. The debate surrounding the routine application of brain MRI for detecting BMs in patients with LC is centered on balancing the benefits of early detection and treatment against considerations such as cost, accessibility, and the relatively low incidence of asymptomatic BMs in the early stages of LC [ 29 , 30 ]. Therefore, personalized MRI screening, informed by these blood biomarkers―which are relatively more accessible and cheaper than MRI―can be expected mitigated the downsides of routine MRI evaluations and enhance their overall benefits.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering that these markers are not specific to BM pathology, they cannot replace MRI but can complement it by aiding in prioritizing MRI scans for those at higher risk of BM. The debate surrounding the routine application of brain MRI for detecting BMs in patients with LC is centered on balancing the benefits of early detection and treatment against considerations such as cost, accessibility, and the relatively low incidence of asymptomatic BMs in the early stages of LC [ 29 , 30 ]. Therefore, personalized MRI screening, informed by these blood biomarkers―which are relatively more accessible and cheaper than MRI―can be expected mitigated the downsides of routine MRI evaluations and enhance their overall benefits.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the cost of screening in an unselected population is considerable and the benefit is questionable, given the conflicting international screening guidelines and clinicians' possible tendency to conduct investigations in excess of the recommended stage (14,(33)(34)(35). In this study, we developed a "two-step" ANN model for predicting synchronous organspecific metastasis in LC patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) and positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) are the common techniques to screen the distant metastasis in LC patients. However, routine DM screening to all LC patients is controversial because of low detection rate of asymptomatic patients, invasive operation, potential risk of adverse reactions, complex process and high cost (10)(11)(12)(13)(14). Therefore, there are strong requirements for the identification of a high-risk group with distant metastasis and the rationalization of DM screening in LC patients.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%