2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.msard.2021.103144
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Should we still only rely on EDSS to evaluate disability in multiple sclerosis patients? A study of inter and intra rater reliability

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3 , improvement in EDSS scores in 2019 was likely to occur in those PwMS who had had lower EDSS scores in 2009, while those with higher EDSS scores in 2009 were more likely to progress. The apparent improvement in those with lower scores may relate to inter-observer variability between 2009 and 2019, bearing in mind that inter-rater error is highest for low EDSS scores [ 19 ]. PwMS who had progressed on the ‘Any Progression’ criterion by 2019 were more likely to have demonstrated greater delay in their per-region pupillary responses in 2009 ( Table 1 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 , improvement in EDSS scores in 2019 was likely to occur in those PwMS who had had lower EDSS scores in 2009, while those with higher EDSS scores in 2009 were more likely to progress. The apparent improvement in those with lower scores may relate to inter-observer variability between 2009 and 2019, bearing in mind that inter-rater error is highest for low EDSS scores [ 19 ]. PwMS who had progressed on the ‘Any Progression’ criterion by 2019 were more likely to have demonstrated greater delay in their per-region pupillary responses in 2009 ( Table 1 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most popular and widely used instrument is the EDSS. However, considering that the inter-rater variability of EDSS is as high as 30%, establishing an objective and easily measurable biomarker would be preferable ( 95 ). Many studies have demonstrated that blood GFAP concentration is independently associated with EDSS score in NMOSD patients ( 59 , 73 , 76 78 , 96 ).…”
Section: Gfap In Blood As a Biomarker For Nmosdmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At present, the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) is considered the gold standard for the assessment of neurological disability and progression in patients with MS [ 20 ]. In recent years, however, several limitations of the EDSS scale have emerged, including significant inter-rater variability and underestimation of functional parameters such as cognition, vision, and upper limb function, with changes in those parameters not always being reflected by the global EDSS score [ 21 , 22 , 23 ]. In addition, EDSS has a low sensitivity at higher values.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, EDSS has a low sensitivity at higher values. EDSS scores >4–6 are mainly driven by changes in ambulatory function, while scores >6 are reflective of changes in general daily living [ 21 , 24 ]. Additional instruments have been created for more sensitive assessment of functional parameters (e.g., the Nine-Hole Peg test for manual dexterity and the Timed 25-Feet-Walk-Test for ambulation), and composite measures can be used alongside EDSS to allow a wider view of the disease [ 24 , 25 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation