Background:The cross-body and the modified sleeper stretch have been used to improve posterior shoulder soft tissue flexibility and to increase glenohumeral joint internal rotation (GHJ IR) in overhead athletes. However, due to the inability to stabilize patient's scapula and control GHJ rotation with the cross-body stretch and the potential for subacromial impingement or symptoms' aggravation with the modified sleeper stretch, a new stretching technique was developed as an alternative to these commonly used stretches that may allow for greater stability of the scapula without reproducing symptoms, as well as providing an inhibition component to the posterior shoulder girdle muscles.Thus, the current study aimed to examine and compare a novel stretching technique to the traditional modified sleeper stretch to determine the effect on glenohumeral IR range of motion (ROM), selfreported pain, and subject satisfaction in overhead athletes with glenohumeral internal rotation deficits (GIRD).Methods: Forty-two overhead athletes with GIRD [mean age 25.9 卤 2.6 years, 20 males and 22 females] participated in this study. Participants were randomly assigned into either novel stretching group or modified sleeper stretching group. IR ROM was measured with a digital inclinometer, painwas measured with Numeric Pain Rating Scale, and subject satisfaction level was measured by a 6item questionnaire developed and validated by the study's authors. Outcomes were measured before, immediately, and at week 4 post intervention.
Results:There was no significant group by time interaction effect for IR ROM (p=0.27); however, there was a significant change over time (p<0.001, 畏 2 =0.77). Both groups demonstrated a significant increase in IR from baseline to immediate and week 4, and from immediate to week 4 (p<0.001).There was also a significant reduction in pain intensity over time for the novel group (p=0.016, r=0.6) compared to the traditional group (p=0.080). For the satisfaction level, only the easiness of performance was significantly different and in favor of the traditional group (p=0.020, r=0.5) following the 4 weeks of the stretching protocols.