2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.math.2007.07.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Shoulder kinematic features using arm elevation and rotation tests for classifying patients with frozen shoulder syndrome who respond to physical therapy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
32
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
32
2
Order By: Relevance
“…For studies that divided participants into two or more groups according to i) baseline characteristics [17,18] or ii) successful versus unsuccessful outcome [19], mean differences plus standard deviation and/or 95% confidence intervals (CI) for each group, and if available between groups are presented. Where studies have performed accuracy statistics for a clinical prediction rule, details of the former are presented [20,21].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…For studies that divided participants into two or more groups according to i) baseline characteristics [17,18] or ii) successful versus unsuccessful outcome [19], mean differences plus standard deviation and/or 95% confidence intervals (CI) for each group, and if available between groups are presented. Where studies have performed accuracy statistics for a clinical prediction rule, details of the former are presented [20,21].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However a common omission was clarification that somatic referred pain from the cervical spine, distinct from radiculopathy, was excluded as a source of shoulder pain; one study [21] excluded patients with nerve root signs and another excluded patients with cervical spondylosis [24], three studies [19,22,23] stated that the cervical spine was excluded as a source of referral, but only one study [22] stated the mechanism by which this decision was made. One study purposely did not exclude participants with cervical spine pathology [25].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…If change was < = 20%, the patient was categorized in the nonresponsive group. We chose 20% change in FLEX-SF as the responsive criterion because the patients generally felt satisfied with 20% improvement from our investigation in the clinic [27]. …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%