2018 IEEE 19th International Symposium on "A World of Wireless, Mobile and Multimedia Networks" (WoWMoM) 2018
DOI: 10.1109/wowmom.2018.8449731
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Show me the Cache: Optimizing Cache-Friendly Recommendations for Sequential Content Access

Abstract: Caching has been successfully applied in wired networks, in the context of Content Distribution Networks (CDNs), and is quickly gaining ground for wireless systems. Storing popular content at the edge of the network (e.g. at small cells) is seen as a "win-win" for both the user (reduced access latency) and the operator (reduced load on the transport network and core servers). Nevertheless, the much smaller size of such edge caches, and the volatility of user preferences suggest that standard caching methods do… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
63
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
63
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There is clearly an opportunity to couple caching policies with the importance of each content file, measured in terms of revenue (user payments). First steps towards this direction have been made, e.g., see [54], [129] where content popularity is not the sole caching criterion. Charging the cached content delivery in proportion to the induced bandwidth consumption, inversely proportional to its expected cache hit ratio, or based on the service quality improvement it offers to the user, are only some first intuitive suggestions worthwhile investigating.…”
Section: E Cooperation Incentives and Pricingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is clearly an opportunity to couple caching policies with the importance of each content file, measured in terms of revenue (user payments). First steps towards this direction have been made, e.g., see [54], [129] where content popularity is not the sole caching criterion. Charging the cached content delivery in proportion to the induced bandwidth consumption, inversely proportional to its expected cache hit ratio, or based on the service quality improvement it offers to the user, are only some first intuitive suggestions worthwhile investigating.…”
Section: E Cooperation Incentives and Pricingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This indicator reflects the end‐to‐end efficiency of the method. LRU, LFU, collaborative filtering recommendation algorithm, and recent progresses: ABT, 5 Nudge, 6 CARS, 7 Femto, 8 CABaRet, 10 DLC, 32 and CoStore 2 are used as comparison mechanisms.…”
Section: Performance Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In brief, in existing recommendation‐based approaches, for example, References 6‐8, relative content objects that are cached, and are also recommended to users. However, this requires the system to be aware of the content relations (eg, similarity scores, trending videos), that is, information owned by the content provider.…”
Section: Performance Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In [22], the cached files will be recommended if the originally requested file is not in cache, and the caching policy was optimized for BS to improve a ''soft cache hits'' ratio. In [23], some cached files are recommended to a user despite that the cached files may not be preferred by the user, and the recommendation policy in one time slot was optimized. In [24], files are proactively pushed to users, and personalized recommendation is integrated with proactive pushing to shape user demand in order to improve the cache efficiency.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%