Purpose: The COVID-19 pandemic precipitated an entirely virtual 2020-2021 residency application cycle. As many specialties plan to continue virtual interviews, it is essential to evaluate what aspects worked well and what can be improved.
Methods: From April to June 2021, authors surveyed participants of the 2020-2021 Match about their experiences with the virtual application cycle. Survey items asked about benefits and drawbacks of virtual interviews, the utility of social media, and thoughts regarding preference signaling mechanisms and application/interview limits.
Results: Participants (n=158) represented 24 states and applied to 31 specialties. The majority (73.1%) were satisfied with their experience during the 2020-2021 Match. Applicants found Twitter (78.4%) and Instagram (69.1%) to be the most helpful social media platforms. Almost all applicants (98.1%) believed that the virtual setting increased financial access to interviews. The majority (68.6%) indicated that residency programs should continue to provide virtual interviews. However, most applicants (73.9%) felt that the virtual setting allowed more students to hoard interviews. Many (66.1%) also felt their medical school did not provide adequate electronic equipment for conducting virtual interviews. While many applicants (56.9%) did not support a cap on the number of applications one can submit, most supported a limit on the number of interviews one can attend (62.7%) as well as a mechanism to signal genuine interest in a program (59.7%).
Conclusions: Our study highlights that, across geography and specialty, many applicants would like virtual interviews to continue and offers insight into how medical schools and residency programs can best support applicants in the virtual environment. The virtual setting also provides an opportunity to evaluate mechanisms to address the congestion from the increasingly high number of applications residency programs receive, with most applicants supporting interview caps and preference signaling.