2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.cag.2022.07.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SHREC’22 track: Open-Set 3D Object Retrieval

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to evaluate the retrieval performance of our method, we choose some state-of-the-art methods [13] as a comparison. All the competing methods take the same experimental settings as the proposed method, and we choose the best results for comparison.…”
Section: Comparison With the State-of-art Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In order to evaluate the retrieval performance of our method, we choose some state-of-the-art methods [13] as a comparison. All the competing methods take the same experimental settings as the proposed method, and we choose the best results for comparison.…”
Section: Comparison With the State-of-art Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mutil-view Pointcloud Mesh Voxel TT VODKA [13] CU MM [13] MM AI SoCSE KLETech [13] NUC AICV [13] Ome Candy [13] HCMUS [13] Ours For the OS-MN40-Miss, we replace the missing modality features with zero vectors, which is also done by other methods using either zeros or random numbers. Overall, our method outperforms other methods on all four evaluation metrics.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations