Shrinkage of Dynamesh IPOM mesh in 6-week follow-up – an experimental study

Jamry, Andrzej; Jałyński, M.; Śmigielski, Janusz; Brocki, Marian

doi:10.5114/wiitm.2011.20988

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 14 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…To achieve this, manufacturers have constructed mesh prostheses composed of layers. Each layer is designed to meet the ideal characteristics of either the parietal or the visceral surface of the mesh [ 1 , 10 , 11 ].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Laparoscopic repair of incisional and ventral hernias with the new type of meshes: randomized control trial.

Grubnik¹,

Grubnik²,

Vorotyntseva³

2014

Videosurgery and Other Miniinvasive Techniques

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

IntroductionLaparoscopic incisional and ventral hernia repair (LIVHR) was first reported by Le Blanc and Booth in 1993. Many studies are available in the literature that have shown that laparoscopic repair of incisional and ventral hernia is preferred over open repair because of lower recurrence rates (less than 10%), less wound morbidity, less pain, and early return to work.AimTo identify the long-term outcomes between the different types of meshes and two techniques of mesh fixation, i.e., tacks (method Double crown) and transfascial polypropylene sutures.Material and methodsA total of 92 patients underwent LIVHR at our department between January 2009 and August 2012. The hernias were umbilical in 26 patients, paraumbilical in 15 patients and incisional in 51 patients. All patients admitted for LIVHR were randomized to either group I (tacker fixation of ePTFE meshes) or group II (suture fixation of meshes with nitinol frame) using computer-generated random numbers with block randomization and sealed envelopes for concealed allocation.ResultsThe mean mesh fixation time was significantly higher in the tacker fixation group (117 ±15 min vs. 72 ±6 min, p < 0.01). There were no conversions in either group. The median postoperative hospital stay was 3.5 ±1.5 days. All patients were followed up at 1, 3, 6, 12 and every 6 months thereafter postoperatively. There were 5 recurrences in the study population. In group I there were 4 patients with recurrence, and only 1 patient in the group with meshes with a nitinol frame.ConclusionsMeshes of the new generation with a nitinol framework can significantly improve laparoscopic ventral hernia repair. The fixation of these meshes is very simple using 3–4 transfascial sutures. The absence of shrinkage of these meshes makes the probability of recurrence minimal. Absence of tackers allows postoperative pain to be minimized. We consider that these new meshes can significantly improve laparoscopic ventral hernia repair.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%