2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.epsr.2012.11.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Shuffled differential evolution for large scale economic dispatch

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 123 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The optimal real power generation output, the FC, emission and power loss obtained for the 40-unit test system using various intelligent techniques are given in Table XIV. It can be inferred from Table XIV that the minimum production cost obtained using the CRO technique is comparatively smaller with respect to those obtained by TLBO [21], quasi-oppositional TLBO (QOTLBO) [21], GA-API [42] and stochastic DE (SDE) [44] discussed in this paper. The convergence of optimal solution using CRO is shown in Figure 5, where only about 55 iterations are needed to find the near-optimal solution.…”
Section: Case 2 (With Wind Firms)mentioning
confidence: 74%
“…The optimal real power generation output, the FC, emission and power loss obtained for the 40-unit test system using various intelligent techniques are given in Table XIV. It can be inferred from Table XIV that the minimum production cost obtained using the CRO technique is comparatively smaller with respect to those obtained by TLBO [21], quasi-oppositional TLBO (QOTLBO) [21], GA-API [42] and stochastic DE (SDE) [44] discussed in this paper. The convergence of optimal solution using CRO is shown in Figure 5, where only about 55 iterations are needed to find the near-optimal solution.…”
Section: Case 2 (With Wind Firms)mentioning
confidence: 74%
“…It can be seen from the graph and the table that the minimum cost is rst reached by using SCA algorithm and the rest of the algorithms take more time as compared to SCA. According to Table 1, the minimum fuel cost for 13 generator units in the proposed algorithm is 24512.6085 $/hr, which is better than the those in SDE [37] and ORCCRO [39]. The minimum, maximum, and average fuel costs obtained after 50 trials are presented in Table 2.…”
Section: Simulations and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Test case 1: 13 generator units have been considered in test system 1 with transmission losses. The input data for the transmission loss is taken from the study by Srinivasa and Vaisakh [37]. The total power demand is 2520 MW.…”
Section: Simulations and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations