2004
DOI: 10.1038/sj.gt.3302384
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Shuttle of lentiviral vectors via transplanted cells in vivo

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

5
20
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
5
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These studies, along with PCR results in transplantation studies, indicate that vector particle transfer results in proviral integration and that mere protein transfer (i.e., pseudotransduction) accounts for only a minor portion of GFP expression in recipient fibroblasts. We also found that particle transfer diminishes with additional posttransduction washes of primary cells but is not completely abolished, consistent with studies by Blomer and coworkers (5). Importantly, particles shed from primary targets (i.e., hematopoietic cells) remain fully infectious, and the transfer efficiency to secondary targets is a function of vector particle loading (i.e., MOI).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…These studies, along with PCR results in transplantation studies, indicate that vector particle transfer results in proviral integration and that mere protein transfer (i.e., pseudotransduction) accounts for only a minor portion of GFP expression in recipient fibroblasts. We also found that particle transfer diminishes with additional posttransduction washes of primary cells but is not completely abolished, consistent with studies by Blomer and coworkers (5). Importantly, particles shed from primary targets (i.e., hematopoietic cells) remain fully infectious, and the transfer efficiency to secondary targets is a function of vector particle loading (i.e., MOI).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…Indeed, in our own studies we recovered only ϳ10% infectious particles in the non-cell-associated fraction after a 1-h exposure of vector to primary hematopoietic cells, consistent with results by Cole and colleagues (10). Moreover, retention of particles on the cell surface can result in localized secondary transduction in recipients after direct injection of lentivectorexposed cardiomyocytes into brain and muscle tissue (5). However, direct extrapolation of those findings to protocols involving ex vivo gene transfer to and subsequent intravenous injection of washed hematopoietic cells is difficult, and the quality and quantity of any potential inadvertent transfer and secondary transduction in vivo under these circumstances is unclear.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…S4). Transduced host cells were not observed in the culture medium injected controls (n ¼ 6 eyes), and the virally transfected cells were washed extensively and FAC-sorted prior to transplantation, but we cannot rule out the possibility that a few viral particles have been shuttled with the cells, as has been shown previously for lentiviral vectors [24].…”
Section: Esc-derived Retinal Cells Transplanted To the Adult Retinamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent study by Blomer et al 18 reports the presence of infectious VSV-G pseudotype lentiviral particles on cells injected into animals after a 5-h ex vivo transduction (at MOI 7), and persisting at low levels even after extensive washing. We have not evaluated to what extent injected cells in our model serve as a 'shuttle' for unincorporated viral particles, but it is worthwhile to emphasize the differences between their protocol and the one proposed here.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%