1985
DOI: 10.1093/ije/14.1.32
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sick Individuals and Sick Populations

Abstract: Aetiology confronts two distinct issues: the determinants of individual cases, and the determinants of incidence rate. If exposure to a necessary agent is homogeneous within a population, then case/control and cohort methods will fail to detect it: they will only identify markers of susceptibility. The corresponding strategies in control are the 'high-risk' approach, which seeks to protect susceptible individuals, and the population approach, which seeks to control the causes of incidence. The two approaches a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

17
1,603
2
76

Year Published

1993
1993
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2,672 publications
(1,698 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
17
1,603
2
76
Order By: Relevance
“…An alternative but related interpretation is that the apparent ‘failure’ of people to adhere to public health guidance may be explained in terms of the prevention paradox 14, 27: although adhering to guidelines might result in the improvement of the population's health as a whole, most individuals are unlikely to see a noticeable improvement in their own health, and therefore lack a sufficient incentive to comply with health guidelines. Public health guidance, which acknowledges people's concerns about the impacts which their behaviour has on valued responsibilities and relationships, may be more effective than guidance which relies upon individuals changing their behaviour purely because of health considerations 14.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An alternative but related interpretation is that the apparent ‘failure’ of people to adhere to public health guidance may be explained in terms of the prevention paradox 14, 27: although adhering to guidelines might result in the improvement of the population's health as a whole, most individuals are unlikely to see a noticeable improvement in their own health, and therefore lack a sufficient incentive to comply with health guidelines. Public health guidance, which acknowledges people's concerns about the impacts which their behaviour has on valued responsibilities and relationships, may be more effective than guidance which relies upon individuals changing their behaviour purely because of health considerations 14.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After the intervention the prevalence of obesity decreased 3.8% in boys and 3.0% in girls. Small shifts in BMI may be more effective at a population level than simply reducing the prevalence of obesity [36].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Comparable programs among high-risk populations indeed found better results, such as modest reductions in blood pressure, cholesterol, and weight, possibly because high risk participants are more likely to achieve measurable changes in behavior (18,44,45). The high risk approach however, does not solve the origin of the problem (46). It may be worthwhile to evaluate an adapted form of the guideline among high risk groups, such as populations at risk for CVD, hypertension, or diabetes.…”
Section: Verweij Et Almentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It may be worthwhile to evaluate an adapted form of the guideline among high risk groups, such as populations at risk for CVD, hypertension, or diabetes. To achieve a meaningful degree of prevention and protection at the workplace, ultimately a combination of primary, secondary, and tertiary interventions may be needed (46). Also, there is ongoing debate what approach may be most suitable for obesity prevention.…”
Section: Verweij Et Almentioning
confidence: 99%