Sick Tiger: Social Conflict, State–Business Relations and Exclusive Growth in Thailand

Abstract

State-business relations are considered the key to explaining longterm economic growth. However, the fact that there is neither an ideal nor convergent model of such relations requires us to explore political arrangements that underpin them. This article proposes a modified social conflict approach to state-business relations that incorporates into the analysis the role of intra-elite contestation, marginalised groups, and different kinds of leading economic actor, with a case study of Thailand. It argues that, from 1980 to 1997, Thailand's economic development occurred within the context of multifaceted conflicts and power fragmentation. Banking oligopolies played a leading role in resource allocation that took Thailand to a path of high growth, high inequality and low technological capabilities. Social conflict in the post-1997 era has shifted towards power consolidation, centring on the tussle between the traditional elite and elected politicians. Thaksin's growth regime (2001)(2002)(2003)(2004)(2005)(2006) was state-led in character, with profound populist-redistributive impacts. Two military coups in 2006 and 2014 did not change this consolidated structure. The junta replaced Thaksin at the top of the pecking order and rearranged the inner-outer circles of its own clientelistic networks. This evolution of social conflict has rendered Thailand's economic development increasingly opposing to the notion of inclusive growth.

Trapped In The Semi-Periphery

“…There must be domestic reforms as well. Constructing a developmental state, in which the businesses place the goal of development over the goal of profit and the state protects, supports, and guides the economy through market conforming interventions, would the most preferable development strategy (Kanchoochat et al 2021).…”

Exploring the Effectiveness of the Implemented Sufficient Economy Education Curriculum during Covid-19 Pandemic

“…The application of the concept of sufficient economy, according to Pruetipibultham ( 2010) , amplifies sustainable development at various economic levels in society. Therefore, Kanchoochat, Aiyara and Ngamarunchot ( 2021) posit the significant importance of a sufficient economy to include inclusive growth. Likewise, Jairak, Praneetpolgrang and Subsermsri ( 2015) assert that sufficient economic philosophies have been adopted to enhance information technology development in Thailand.…”

Management of crisis or crisis of management? The Thai government's “policy as discourse” handling of the COVID-19 pandemic

“…e Prayuth regime established a close alliance with a group of Sino-ai conglomerates that served as "Big Brother" mentors for smaller scales in related businesses (Kongkirati and Kanchoochat, 2018). e collective efforts of the conglomerates contributed to the hierarchical aspect of capitalism rather than encouraging local rms to catch up with them, as Kanchoochat et al (2021) termed "Sick Tiger" as a metaphor for how ailand suffers from social con ict, state-business relations, and exclusive growth. Before the pandemic dissipated, they used the term Prayuth regime.…”