“…This situation is similar to the PEO-based electrolytes at the respective salt concentrations. − ,− Informative at this point is the comparison of the normalized ionic conductivity by the volume fraction of the EO-rich nanophase of the undoped and the salt-doped diblock copolymer electrolytes with the respective conductivity of the homopolymer PEO/LiTFSI (Figure ). For the undoped electrolytes, the volume fraction of the EO-PF phase is Here, A refers to the EO-PF repeat and B to the IL+PF repeat, PA and PB refer to the respective polymers, υ i = M i /ρ i Ν Α is the volume of the each phase, M i is the molar mass ( M EO = 44.05 g·mol –1 , M fluorene = 166.22 g·mol –1 , and M IL = 304.51 g·mol –1 ), and ρ i is the density of each component (ρ PEO = 1.128 g·cm –3 , ρ PF = 0.88 g·cm –3 , and ρ IL = 1.23 g·cm –3 ). − Subsequently, we calculated the volume fraction of EO in the EO-PF nanophase, by employing eq (in this case, as A refers to the EO phase and as B refers to the PF phase). As a result, the volume fraction of the EO phase is 0.40, 0.45, and 0.50, for the undoped electrolytes with x = 3, 4, and 5 EO repeat units.…”