1993
DOI: 10.1093/ndt/8.supp1.43
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Side-effects of desferrioxamine in dialysis patients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…50 However, it is not well tolerated, and infusions are required on each dialysis session for many months to be effective. 51 Since the advent of ESAs and better water-purification techniques, iron and aluminum overload have ceased to be major problems in the majority of patients on dialysis, and so this drug is now rarely used. …”
Section: Iron Chelation Therapymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…50 However, it is not well tolerated, and infusions are required on each dialysis session for many months to be effective. 51 Since the advent of ESAs and better water-purification techniques, iron and aluminum overload have ceased to be major problems in the majority of patients on dialysis, and so this drug is now rarely used. …”
Section: Iron Chelation Therapymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[4][5][6] Desferrioxamine (DFO), used as chelation therapy to reduce transfusion induced iron overload, can cause ophthalmological disorders and high frequency sensorineural hearing loss. [7][8][9] Sensorimotor neurotoxicity, associated with high dose DFO treatment has also been reported. 10 In this study we evaluated patients with b-thalassaemia clinically and electrophysiologically, and investigated whether factors such as age, clinical severity of thalassaemia (homozygous b or intermedia), antibodies against hepatitis C virus (HCV), ferritin levels, haematocrit (Ht), and history of transfusions, splenectomy, or DFO treatment are associated with abnormal findings.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, five studies were evaluated: a prospective double-blind randomized controlled trial [16], three randomized clinical trials [17–19], and one historical cohort [20]. All studies were evaluated and classified as having a low risk of bias and adequate methodological quality by the Cochrane referential [13].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One study [20] provided strong evidence of a link between nasal colonization and bloodstream infection caused by S. aureus . In that study, patients who developed infection were transiently recolonized by S. aureus strains identical to the pretreatment colonized strains.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%