Process and Materials Characterization and Diagnostics in IC Manufacturing 2003
DOI: 10.1117/12.485229
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sidewall structure estimation from CD-SEM for lithographic process control

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Precise measurement of sidewall angle has become increasingly important in the semiconductor industry for high precision measurement of the full width half maximum gate linewidth [5]; with decreasing gate line-width dimension. The most common source of sidewall angle variation is photoresist exposure due to focus variation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Precise measurement of sidewall angle has become increasingly important in the semiconductor industry for high precision measurement of the full width half maximum gate linewidth [5]; with decreasing gate line-width dimension. The most common source of sidewall angle variation is photoresist exposure due to focus variation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the measurement accuracy for all of the above-mentioned technologies is decreasing with the ever decreasing nanostructure sizes. OM cannot measure the shape of objects with lateral sizes less than 1 μm; AFM cannot accurately measure shape but can measure the nanostructure height if the separation width is longer than the tip width; lateral and vertical dimensions from SEM pictures are hard to obtain if the width of the borderline produced by the secondary electron becomes a significant part of the dimension to be measured [5]. Scatterometry and Mueller ellipsometry can measure the shape of periodic nanostructures [6][7][8]; however, the accuracy of the shape dimensions decrease with decreasing nanostructure sizes and increasing complexity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the past years, several different techniques have been proposed to obtain a direct measurement of this quantity, examples can be Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM) and Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM); nevertheless, technological innovation soon demanded more accurate and reliable metrology tools. For this reason, researchers developed numerous variations of the aforementioned techniques, such as a tilt-scanning method for AFM [4], Critical Dimension AFM [5] and Critical Dimension SEM [6]. These measuring tool all have the great feature of being able to perform non-destructive measurement, nevertheless they all have different drawbacks (for instance the Rayleigh diffraction limit for the AFM) affecting their performances.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since CD-SEM tools that capture top-down images are currently being used for measurement of CD, we investigated the possibility of estimating sidewall shape using only features extracted from top-down images and a database of corresponding historical topdown and cross-section images. 1,2 In this paper, we propose an image retrieval system to estimate sidewall structure from top-down imagery. Features from a top-down query image are compared to a database of features from other top-down images, each with known corresponding sidewall shapes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%