Deflection and stress calculated from an experimentally validated, high-fidelity finite element model (FEM) of a photovoltaic module experiencing mechanical load was compared to results from a simplified FEM treating the module laminate as a homogenized composite using a rule of mixtures approach, and further compared to analytical calculations treating the module as a Kirchoff-Love flat plate. The goal of this study was to determine the error incurred by analyzing module mechanics with varying levels of simplification, since resolving the aspect ratios of a module is computationally expensive. Homogenized FEMs were found to underpredict peak deflection under a 1.0 kPa load by between 13 and 19% for lower and upper bound application of the rule of mixtures. However, module shape was captured, implying that a useful replication of a resolved model could be achieved with a reduced, calibrated material stiffness. Homogenized stress results captured glass layer tensile stress components to within 46 to 52% at a sample location of interest, though agreement was poor through the remainder of the laminate due to the lack of material resolution. For plate theory, deflection was overpredicted by 45 to 67% for upper and lower bound homogenizations, and frame-adjacent module shapes were not adequately replicated. Stress results mirrored FEM trends but magnitudes were not well correlated to resolved model values. These results support the use of homogenized laminate models for module shape derivation, though resolved models remain necessary for stress analyses. The accuracy of plate theory was found to be inadequate for most applications.