2008
DOI: 10.1146/annurev.soc.34.040507.134737
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sieve, Incubator, Temple, Hub: Empirical and Theoretical Advances in the Sociology of Higher Education

Abstract: Higher education lacks an intellectually coherent sociology; varied research on colleges and universities is dispersed widely throughout the discipline. This review initiates a critical integration of this scholarship. We argue that sociologists have conceived of higher education systems as sieves for sorting and stratifying populations, incubators for the development of competent social actors, temples for the legitimation of official knowledge, and hubs connecting multiple institutional domains. Bringing the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
190
0
4

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 280 publications
(194 citation statements)
references
References 123 publications
0
190
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Education's impact on holding a leadership position in a local organization is contingent on the educational level of others in a cohort, and it is probable that this is due to competition. Individuals with college degrees usually have more human, social, and cultural capital (Putnam 2000;Stevens, Armstrong, and Arum 2008); all of these can be used to convince others to support their leadership intentions. However, if everyone in a person's cohort has the same levels of human, social, and cultural capital, then it no longer provides a competitive advantage (Campbell 2009;Nie, Junn, and Stehlik-Barry 1996).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Education's impact on holding a leadership position in a local organization is contingent on the educational level of others in a cohort, and it is probable that this is due to competition. Individuals with college degrees usually have more human, social, and cultural capital (Putnam 2000;Stevens, Armstrong, and Arum 2008); all of these can be used to convince others to support their leadership intentions. However, if everyone in a person's cohort has the same levels of human, social, and cultural capital, then it no longer provides a competitive advantage (Campbell 2009;Nie, Junn, and Stehlik-Barry 1996).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Third, college promotes interpersonal interaction, increasing social capital i (Moffatt 1989;Stevens, Armstrong, and Arum 2008). Finally, colleges develop cultural capital-as well as confidence and social prestige-by providing a better understanding of how social institutions work (Stevens, Armstrong, and Arum 2008;Wilson and Musick 1997).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Our attention to status is informed by the robust body of research on status differences across U.S. colleges and universities. As this scholarship demonstrates, the field of U.S. higher education is very hierarchical (Bastedo and Gumport 2003;Stevens, Armstrong, and Arum 2008;Posselt et al 2012), and field-level practices and policies often differ according to school status (e.g., Levitsky and Armstrong 2017).…”
Section: The Institutionalization and Contested Legitimacy Of Affirmamentioning
confidence: 99%