2017
DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/aa86b4
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SÍGAME Simulations of the , , and Line Emission from Star-forming Galaxies at

Abstract: Of the almost 40 star forming galaxies at z > ∼ 5 (not counting QSOs) observed in [C II] to date, nearly half are either very faint in [C II], or not detected at all, and fall well below expectations based on locally derived relations between star formation rate and [C II] luminosity. This has raised questions as to how reliable [C II] is as a tracer of star formation activity at these epochs and how factors such as metallicity might affect the [C II] emission. Combining cosmological zoom simulations of ga… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

8
93
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 103 publications
(102 citation statements)
references
References 111 publications
(221 reference statements)
8
93
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The top row shows face-on maps of total gas column density, H 2 column density, density weighted temperature, metal surface mass density, dust surface mass density, and stellar mass surface density in a 5kpc cube surrounding the galaxy. Similarly, face-on images for nine IR lines and twelve of the nebular lines listed in works that have modelled these systems Pallottini et al 2017a,b;Olsen et al 2017;Vallini et al 2015), while [OIII] 88.33µm is picking out individual star forming regions (see also Katz et al 2017;Moriwaki et al 2018). In these images, we are showing the emergent emission rather than the intrinsic emission as in practice, these lines are observed against and modulated by the background CMB (Chatzikos et al 2013;Lagache et al 2018).…”
Section: Results -General Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 51%
“…The top row shows face-on maps of total gas column density, H 2 column density, density weighted temperature, metal surface mass density, dust surface mass density, and stellar mass surface density in a 5kpc cube surrounding the galaxy. Similarly, face-on images for nine IR lines and twelve of the nebular lines listed in works that have modelled these systems Pallottini et al 2017a,b;Olsen et al 2017;Vallini et al 2015), while [OIII] 88.33µm is picking out individual star forming regions (see also Katz et al 2017;Moriwaki et al 2018). In these images, we are showing the emergent emission rather than the intrinsic emission as in practice, these lines are observed against and modulated by the background CMB (Chatzikos et al 2013;Lagache et al 2018).…”
Section: Results -General Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 51%
“…Our model galaxy suite is generated from the MUFASA-zoom simulation series, which are zoomed galaxies from the MUFASA cosmological simulation (Davé et al , 2017a. This zoom simulation methodology has been described in detail in Olsen et al (2017), Narayanan et al (2018), Abruzzo et al (2018), and Privon et al (2018). We therefore refer the reader to those works for details, and summarize the salient points here.…”
Section: Cosmological Zoom Galaxy Formation Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, some simulations calculate abundances of specific elements on the fly, whereas others only contain one number for the metallicity and an abundance table must be adopted. Including several elements separately instead of a fixed abundance table, has been shown to make a significant difference for modeling of the fine-structure [C II] line [124].…”
Section: From Cloud To Galaxy Scale Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%