2012 15th International Multitopic Conference (INMIC) 2012
DOI: 10.1109/inmic.2012.6511463
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sign language localization: Learning to eliminate language dialects

Abstract: Machine translation of sign language into spoken languages is an important yet non-trivial task. The sheer variety of dialects that exist in any sign language makes it only harder to come up with a generalized sign language classification system. Though a lot of work has been done in this area previously but most of the approaches rely on intrusive hardware in the form of wired or colored gloves or are specific language/dialect dependent for accurate sign language interpretation. We propose a cost-effective, n… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The feature extraction aid in accuracy improvement, and speed [47]. Some of these feature extraction method include SURF (Speeded Up Robust Feature) [34], speed up robust feature (Laplace of Gaussian with box filter) [34], SIFT (shift-invariant feature transform) [33], PCA (Principal Component Analysis) [37], [4], LDA (Linear Discriminant Analysis) [48], Convexity defects and k-curvature [49], time domain to frequency domain [31], [35], Local binary pattern, etc. The feature extraction methods used for SLR-based study is tabulated in Table III.…”
Section: B Feature Extractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The feature extraction aid in accuracy improvement, and speed [47]. Some of these feature extraction method include SURF (Speeded Up Robust Feature) [34], speed up robust feature (Laplace of Gaussian with box filter) [34], SIFT (shift-invariant feature transform) [33], PCA (Principal Component Analysis) [37], [4], LDA (Linear Discriminant Analysis) [48], Convexity defects and k-curvature [49], time domain to frequency domain [31], [35], Local binary pattern, etc. The feature extraction methods used for SLR-based study is tabulated in Table III.…”
Section: B Feature Extractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Statistic shows that out of the total population, 5.035 million are disabled where 0.38 million suffer from speaking loss or mute which is around 7.5% of the overall disabled population [1]. It is very important to understand that what an impaired hearing person feels and goes through.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%