1976
DOI: 10.1177/001872087601800203
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Signal Complexity, Response Complexity, and Signal Specification in Vigilance

Abstract: Sixty-four subjects served in a 50-min auditory monitoring task. Task complexity was examined with regard to both signal and response demands in an effort to determine variance contributing to each of these variables. Signals were presented at a mean rate of one per min, and no intersignal interval was greater than 2 min. Results showed that signal demands were of greater importance in affecting performance than were post-detection response contingencies. Statistically significant differences were obtained bet… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1980
1980
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some researchers have simply ignored the end-spurt effect, dropping the final period from analyses (e.g., Scheffers et al, 1999). Others have changed methodology to allay the effects of the end-spurt, such as removing clocks and personal time devices (e.g., Childs, 1976;Halcomb & Blackwell, 1969) or suggesting the experiment will be longer than it actually is (e.g., McCann, 1969). Whereas others might have examined larger time-on-task periods (e.g., experiment halves) due to decreased confidence and statistical power as they traditionally focus on behavioral performance regarding targets (i.e., low number of stimuli in smaller time-on-task periods).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some researchers have simply ignored the end-spurt effect, dropping the final period from analyses (e.g., Scheffers et al, 1999). Others have changed methodology to allay the effects of the end-spurt, such as removing clocks and personal time devices (e.g., Childs, 1976;Halcomb & Blackwell, 1969) or suggesting the experiment will be longer than it actually is (e.g., McCann, 1969). Whereas others might have examined larger time-on-task periods (e.g., experiment halves) due to decreased confidence and statistical power as they traditionally focus on behavioral performance regarding targets (i.e., low number of stimuli in smaller time-on-task periods).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kennedy (1971), Childs (1976), and Galinsky et al (1993) are examples of Human Factors research into fatigue and stress while doing auditory monitoring.…”
Section: Hermann and Huntmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Childs found that subjects perform better when monitoring for only one target than monitoring for several targets, indicating that the attention resources are important in vigilance [3]. Parasuraman found that high event rates would decrease sensitivity and vigilance performance, any technique that will enhance a subject's memory of signal characteristics should improve vigilance [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%