2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0376-6357(03)00146-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Signal detection behavior in humans and rats: a comparison with matched tasks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
30
0
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
30
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This task was selected because of the sensitivity of the task to manipulations of basal forebrain corticopetal cholinergic neurons (e.g., McGaughy et al 1996, 1998) and because of recent reports that demonstrated the translational potential and use of this task in multiple species, including mice (St. Peters et al 2011) and humans (Bushnell et al 2003; Demeter et al 2008; Howe et al 2013). The effects of infusions of orexin A directly into the basal forebrain were examined in a well-trained version of the task and with attentional demands increased by presenting a visual distracter.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This task was selected because of the sensitivity of the task to manipulations of basal forebrain corticopetal cholinergic neurons (e.g., McGaughy et al 1996, 1998) and because of recent reports that demonstrated the translational potential and use of this task in multiple species, including mice (St. Peters et al 2011) and humans (Bushnell et al 2003; Demeter et al 2008; Howe et al 2013). The effects of infusions of orexin A directly into the basal forebrain were examined in a well-trained version of the task and with attentional demands increased by presenting a visual distracter.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Third, manipulations that decrease the activity of corticopetal cholinergic neurons, such as systemic or intrabasalis administration of benzodiazepine receptor agonists (Moore et al 1995) or glutamate receptor antagonists (Fadel et al 2001), decrease signal detection in this task (Holley et al 1995;Turchi and Sarter 2001). Finally, some experiments have provided evidence that this task may be useful for translation to humans (Bushnell et al 2003;Demeter et al 2008). In the present experiment, after reaching stable performance levels in this attention task, rats were given either systemic or intrabasalis administration of the orexin-1 receptor antagonist, SB-334867, prior to task performance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been very effective in establishing the role of specific transmitter and receptor systems in normal function and in diseases such as Alzheimer’s, schizophrenia, and Parkinson’s disease (see reviews by Fray & Robbins, 1996; Levaux, Potvin, Sepehry, Sablier, Mendrek, & Stip, 2007). Bushnell and colleagues (Bushnell, Benigus, & Case, 2003) examined rat and human performance in a simple sustained attention task similar to the task used here. They found similar performance across the two species, although there was some suggestion that human males were differently affected by trial rate (intertrial interval length) than were the other groups.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%