2019
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-50790-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Signal flow control of complex signaling networks

Abstract: Complex disease such as cancer is often caused by genetic mutations that eventually alter the signal flow in the intra-cellular signaling network and result in different cell fate. Therefore, it is crucial to identify control targets that can most effectively block such unwanted signal flow. For this purpose, systems biological analysis provides a useful framework, but mathematical modeling of complicated signaling networks requires massive time-series measurements of signaling protein activity levels for accu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
(67 reference statements)
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Last, we have modified the original SFA algorithm 47 to apply FVS control-based perturbations. Unlike the SFA control method introduced by Lee and Cho 74 , where edge modifications (removals or additions) were implemented to perform perturbations, our method of perturbations to a node’s state maintains the FVS of the network. In addition, we have implemented permanent overrides on FVS control nodes rather than the original form of SFA perturbations that are transiently applied by changing only the initial states of nodes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Last, we have modified the original SFA algorithm 47 to apply FVS control-based perturbations. Unlike the SFA control method introduced by Lee and Cho 74 , where edge modifications (removals or additions) were implemented to perform perturbations, our method of perturbations to a node’s state maintains the FVS of the network. In addition, we have implemented permanent overrides on FVS control nodes rather than the original form of SFA perturbations that are transiently applied by changing only the initial states of nodes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, b is the logarithm of the initial state of node i and α is a hyperparameter used to weigh the influence of the network structure and initial node state on the Signal Flow. By default, in our pipeline, the hyperparameter α is set to 0.9 to provide greater weight to the network topology rather than the initial activity based on the parameter settings used in previous control studies using SFA 74 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…"NM" indicates a non-locally-monotonic model. [25] 1953 669 >1000 DNF 23.62 5.93 DNF 32 SN-5 [26] 2746 829 >1000 DNF 28.94 DNF DNF 33 turei-2016 [30] 4691 1257 ??? DNF DNF DNF DNF mbpn can handle only locally-monotonic models and Trappist can handle general models, it is difficult to further compare between them.…”
Section: Selected Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies have employed ordinary differential equations 22 , 23 or Boolean logical models 24 26 , which require specific parameter fitting or logical rule inference using accumulated experimental data. Recently, a signal flow analysis 27 , 28 method was developed, in which the influence of signals of perturbed nodes on the activity changes of the other nodes can be estimated based on the network structure and mode of action of each edge.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%