Optical Fiber Communication Conference and National Fiber Optic Engineers Conference 2009
DOI: 10.1364/ofc.2009.otha6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Signal-Induced Rayleigh Noise Reduction using Gain Saturation in an Integrated R-EAM-SOA

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Up to now, analysis of signal squeezing, under dynamic conditions, has relied upon the well-known single-pass SOA behavior [5]. Signal squeezing experiments using RSOAs for frequency-swept sinusoidal signals [2] and optical noise [6] show strong reduction at low frequencies. The origin of strong squeezing cannot be explained from SOA theory alone.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Up to now, analysis of signal squeezing, under dynamic conditions, has relied upon the well-known single-pass SOA behavior [5]. Signal squeezing experiments using RSOAs for frequency-swept sinusoidal signals [2] and optical noise [6] show strong reduction at low frequencies. The origin of strong squeezing cannot be explained from SOA theory alone.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, its importance goes significantly further: because of the presence of a RBS [11] crosstalk component that is much stronger than the useful signal, a direct-detection receiver would simply not work, owing to the beating accompanying a CW signal. Many research groups have addressed the topic of reducing the effect of RBS in direct-detection receivers by using different optical or electrical techniques, but, to the best of our knowledge, none can function with an optical signal to Rayleigh noise ratio (OSNRN) lower than 5-6 dB [13], while here the OSNRN target was in the negative range, such as the previously discussed −25 dB OSNRN value. The self-coherent receiver is key here, since it provides access in the electrical domain to an exact replica of the received optical field (and not just its instantaneous power, as in direct detection) such that there is no beating between the signal and the RBS, but the two signals simply appear as added, both at the field level and in the equivalent electrical components after coherent detection.…”
Section: Discussion On Experimental Results and System Optimization Imentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Gain values smaller than 10 dB are not recommendable because of the receiver noise. For the input powers received at the RSOA ( dBm), no significant gain saturation of the RSOA is observed that could potentially reduce the crosstalk [7], [4].…”
Section: Experimental Measures and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The aim of this work is to analyze the penalties in the upstream and downstream paths due to RB signals, extending our preliminary study [3], establishing the most adequate location of the multiplexer (MUX) in wavelength-division-multiplexing (WDM)-PONs, and the optimum ONU gain. Other effects, like the RB gain saturation [4] and the variation of the bandwidth of the receiver and the optical filter [5], are not considered here. An extension to time-division-multiplexing (TDM)-PON is under investigation and first results can be found in [6].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%