1984
DOI: 10.1016/0730-725x(84)90082-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Signal, noise, and contrast in nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) imaging

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0
1

Year Published

1993
1993
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
26
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…64,65 To include this bias, the synthetic noiseless MR signal intensity in the previous section was placed entirely in the real channel, then independent noise fluctuations were added to the real and imaginary channels, and the modulus was computed and integerized (see Appendix).…”
Section: Addition Of Noise To the Synthetic Dt-mri Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…64,65 To include this bias, the synthetic noiseless MR signal intensity in the previous section was placed entirely in the real channel, then independent noise fluctuations were added to the real and imaginary channels, and the modulus was computed and integerized (see Appendix).…”
Section: Addition Of Noise To the Synthetic Dt-mri Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By varying β, a tradeoff between spatial resolution and contrast resolution is obtained in the reconstructed image. Let CNR be the local image contrast-to-noise ratio defined in [7], [11], and [19] (15) where Ī o and Ī b represent the average intensity (in dB) in the cysts region and the local background region containing the cysts, respectively, and σ I b denotes the standard deviation of the background intensity (in dB). The normalized CNR values of the cyst regions in Fig.…”
Section: B Phantom Imagesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When this problem is suspected, MR images acquired with and without the presence of the monitoring equipment must be compared for both presence of artifact and for overall image quality (generally assessed by measuring the signalto-noise). 4 Other problems occur when electrical artifacts and/ or heating is induced in the monitoring leads by the ra-CAN J ANAESTH 1993 / 40: I 1 / pp 1092-5 diofrequency (RF) pulses and switching of gradients required to generate the MR image. Bums as a result of overheating in leads or probes have been reported, s Risk to the patient from overheating is relatively easily avoided by insulating properly all leads and by assuring that the leads do not make a loop Within the bore of the magnet.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%