1989
DOI: 10.1088/0022-3727/22/12/015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Signal production in scanning electron acoustic microscopy

Abstract: We have studied the variation of the electron acoustic signal in various materials as a function of the beam accelerating voltage and current. The results show that in most materials examined, e.g. copper, CuZnAl alloy and silicon, it is only the total incident beam power which determines the magnitude of the electron acoustic signal produced. In compensated GaAs the electron acoustic signal depends only on the beam current and is independent of the accelerating voltage which is unlike the case for highly dope… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We refer to ref. [37] for a discussion of the computational scaling of the Lanczos-Sternheimer method compared to the conventional sum over states calculations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…We refer to ref. [37] for a discussion of the computational scaling of the Lanczos-Sternheimer method compared to the conventional sum over states calculations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The solution of the Dyson-like equation in the reduced dimension space of the moment expanded response function in analogy to ref. [37] is a possible extension of the presented change of representation. The shape of the Hartree exchange correlation Kernel, that is, an intramolecular interaction, might require high angular momentum contributions, which reduces the advantage of the moment expanded representation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The LDDRF is also important for the adiabatic‐connection fluctuation–dissipation theorem, symmetry adapted perturbation theory, [ 36–40 ] and the random phase approximation. [ 41–44 ]…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%