1990
DOI: 10.1128/jb.172.8.4378-4385.1990
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Signal strains that can detect certain DNA replication and membrane mutants of Escherichia coli: isolation of a new ssb allele, ssb-3

Abstract: Mutations in several dna genes of Escherchia coli, when introduced into a strain with a lac fusion in the SOS gene sulA, resulted in formation of blue colonies on plates containing 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl-1-Dgalactoside (X-Gal). Unexpectedly, several lines of evidence indicated that the blue colony color was not primarily due to induction of the SOS system but rather was due to a membrane defect, along with the replication defect, muking the cel X-Gal extrasensitive (phenotypically Xgx), possibly becaue of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although it has been previously believed that no arginine residues were involved in ssDNA binding [37], six of them in this region of the protein (arginines 21, 41, 56, 72, 86 and 96) are also oriented into the DNA‐binding cleft in a manner that may suggest a possible role in ssDNA binding. Interestingly, the Eco SSB ssb3 mutation, in which Gly‐15 is substituted for aspartic acid, giving rise to an extremely UV‐sensitive phenotype in affected cells [38], can also now be explained by the Eco SSB structure: the observed mutation would produce a striking clash with the essential Trp‐54 residue that is one of the key determinants of DNA binding (Fig. 3 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although it has been previously believed that no arginine residues were involved in ssDNA binding [37], six of them in this region of the protein (arginines 21, 41, 56, 72, 86 and 96) are also oriented into the DNA‐binding cleft in a manner that may suggest a possible role in ssDNA binding. Interestingly, the Eco SSB ssb3 mutation, in which Gly‐15 is substituted for aspartic acid, giving rise to an extremely UV‐sensitive phenotype in affected cells [38], can also now be explained by the Eco SSB structure: the observed mutation would produce a striking clash with the essential Trp‐54 residue that is one of the key determinants of DNA binding (Fig. 3 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2015). Support for the implication of membranes in SSB function comes from a previous study identifying the ssb-3 allele (Schmellik-Sandage & Tessman 1990). This mutation (G15D) renders the cell extremely sensitive to UV irradiation, with a survival curve similar to that for a Δ recA mutation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…At least one region important for protein-protein interactions seems to be conserved in the amino-terminus of all four SSBs. The existence of this region was suggested from the phenotype associated with E. coli ssb-3 mutant (Schmellik-Sandage and Tessman, 1990;Meyer and Laine, 1990 The EcoRI restriction site used to clone the partial cDNA fragment is underlined. Bold underlined nucleotides represent the oligonucleotide used as the 3' primer for the isolation and amplification of RlMI partial cDNA.…”
Section: Similarity To Single-stranded Dna Binding Proteinsmentioning
confidence: 99%