2011
DOI: 10.1121/1.3562179
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Signal-to-noise ratio for source determination and for a comodulated masker in goldfish, Carassius auratus

Abstract: The masking effects of white and amplitude comodulated noise were studied with respect to simple signal detection and sound source determination in goldfish. A stimulus generalization method was used to determine the signal-to-noise ratio required to completely determine the signal's characteristics. It was found that the S=N required for this determination is about 4 dB greater than that required for signal detection, or was about 4 dB greater than the critical masking ratio. This means that the potential har… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These behavioral contexts represent fundamental communication tasks of critical evolutionary importance for frogs and many other animals. Results from this study, therefore, substantially extend earlier work on humans [5, 2123], frogs [41], and other animals [6, 42, 43] by showing that comodulation is a statistic of natural acoustic scenes that can be exploited to mitigate costly, noise-induced errors in communication.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…These behavioral contexts represent fundamental communication tasks of critical evolutionary importance for frogs and many other animals. Results from this study, therefore, substantially extend earlier work on humans [5, 2123], frogs [41], and other animals [6, 42, 43] by showing that comodulation is a statistic of natural acoustic scenes that can be exploited to mitigate costly, noise-induced errors in communication.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…Natural sounds, including frog choruses, exhibit correlated temporal fluctuations (“comodulation”) across the frequency spectrum (Klump, 1996; Nelken et al, 1999). Studies of humans (reviewed in Verhey et al, 2003) and a few other animals (Branstetter and Finneran, 2008; Branstetter et al, 2013; Fay, 2011; Jensen, 2007; Klump and Langemann, 1995; Langemann and Klump, 2007) indicate that auditory systems are sensitive to these correlations. Typically lower signal detection thresholds are found in comodulated noise.…”
Section: Auditory Scene Analysis In Hylamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dip listening is well known in the contexts of human hearing and speech perception (Bacon, Opie, & Montoya, 1998; Cooke, 2006; Füllgrabe, Berthommier, & Lorenzi, 2006; Gustafsson & Arlinger, 1994; Vestegaard, Fyson, & Patterson, 2011). Behavioral and neurophysiological studies of animals from diverse taxa show that simple tonal and narrowband noise signals can be detected at relatively lower thresholds in the presence of maskers with sinusoidal or random level fluctuations, compared with non-fluctuating maskers (birds: Bee, Buschermöhle, & Klump, 2007; Hofer & Klump, 2003; Jensen, 2007; Klump & Langemann, 1995; Langemann & Klump, 2001, 2007; Nieder & Klump, 2001; cats: Nelken et al, Rotman, & Yosef, 1999; dolphins: Branstetter & Finneran, 2008; fish: Fay, 2011; frogs: Goense & Feng, 2012). The hypothesis that dip listening contributes to the ability of nonhuman animals to recognize communication signals in noisy social aggregations (Langemann & Klump, 2005) has so far received limited attention (but see Ronacher & Hoffmann, 2003).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%