2011
DOI: 10.1148/radiol.10100231
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Signal-to-Noise Ratio Improvement in Dynamic Contrast-enhanced CT and MR Imaging with Automated Principal Component Analysis Filtering

Abstract: http://radiology.rsna.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1148/radiol.10100231/-/DC1.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
29
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, it is desirable to optimize the number of principal components for the best compromise between denoising efficiency and information conservation. 35 To this end, the FRI, which is a normalized SNR calculated for a residual signal (the difference between original and filtered tissue curve), of each square in a ROI was calculated to differentiate the informative contrastenhanced signals from random noise. 36 The tissue curves in a ROI were replaced with random white Gaussian noise signals generated with standard deviation of the background signals before the contrast medium arrived at the region and the reference FRI distribution from the noise signals was compared with the tissue FRI distribution.…”
Section: D Pca Filteringmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, it is desirable to optimize the number of principal components for the best compromise between denoising efficiency and information conservation. 35 To this end, the FRI, which is a normalized SNR calculated for a residual signal (the difference between original and filtered tissue curve), of each square in a ROI was calculated to differentiate the informative contrastenhanced signals from random noise. 36 The tissue curves in a ROI were replaced with random white Gaussian noise signals generated with standard deviation of the background signals before the contrast medium arrived at the region and the reference FRI distribution from the noise signals was compared with the tissue FRI distribution.…”
Section: D Pca Filteringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9,[31][32][33][34] While pixelby-pixel analysis is known to be challenging because of poor signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) in the time-concentration curve of each pixel (tissue curve), recently, a method to improve SNR in DCE imaging with automated principal component analysis (PCA) filtering has been proposed. 35 The method uses the idea of fraction of residual information (FRI) criterion 36 to optimize the balance between efficiency of noise reduction and information conservation in the tissue curve. Therefore, the aim of this study is to investigate the effectiveness of the proposed method of PCA filtering combined with the AIF estimation technique on the pixel-by-pixel analysis of DCE-CT data at low temporal resolution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It extracts the principal components (PCs) – a set of new, uncorrelated variables – of the data set and ranks them according to how much of the data's variability they describe. By considering only the highest ranked PCs, that is, the ones that describe a large portion of the variance of the observations and are hence supposed to convey the essential features of the data, PCA can be used for both dimensionality reduction and denoising . We interpret each pixel ( i , j ) in a stack of spectral CEST images as a variable and the corresponding signal intensity S ij ( ω k ) for a certain saturation frequency ω k as an observation of that variable.…”
Section: Pca Denoising Of Spectral Cest Imagesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In medical imaging Hotelling-filters have been used in computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging [12]. In dynamic PET, similar noise-reduction techniques have been described working on raw data, not images, prior to tomographic reconstruction [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%