Signaling pathways have an inherent need for noise to acquire information

Abstract

Background All living systems acquire information about their environment. At the cellular level, they do so through signaling pathways. Such pathways rely on reversible binding interactions between molecules that detect and transmit the presence of an extracellular cue or signal to the cell’s interior. These interactions are inherently stochastic and thus noisy. On the one hand, noise can cause a signaling pathway to produce the same response for different stimuli, which reduces the amount of information a pathway acquires. On the other hand, in processes such as stochastic resonance, noise can improve the detection of weak stimuli and thus the acquisition of information. It is not clear whether the kinetic parameters that determine a pathway’s operation cause noise to reduce or increase the acquisition of information. Results We analyze how the kinetic properties of the reversible binding interactions used by signaling pathways affect the relationship between noise, the response to a signal, and information acquisition. Our results show that, under a wide range of biologically sensible parameter values, a noisy dynamic of reversible binding interactions is necessary to produce distinct responses to different stimuli. As a consequence, noise is indispensable for the acquisition of information in signaling pathways. Conclusions Our observations go beyond previous work by showing that noise plays a positive role in signaling pathways, demonstrating that noise is essential when such pathways acquire information.

Performance Assessment of the Network Reconstruction Approaches on Various Interactomes

“…1 ( Kanehisa et al, 2017 ). Modeling a small-sized network is a challenging task because a small number of molecular interactions limit the overall dynamic range of the signals ( Tkačik et al, 2009 ; Azpeitia et al, 2020 ). Therefore, we discarded KEGG pathways having less than 30 edges from the interactome evaluations.…”

Towards Autonomous Materials–Challenges in Chemical Communication

“…For the above CSTR-based systems, typical response times to changing input are on the order of seconds, [64] which compares to response times for post-translational modifications. Typical half-lives of signaling molecules within biological systems, to further compare, such as for example, nitrous oxide, [12,69] mRNA, and proteins [70,71] are a few seconds, seconds to hours, and hours to days, respectively. Lastly, messengers like norepinephrine and dopamine, have half-lives between 10 s and 100 s. [12] These values are quite comparable to fluctuations in CSTRs.…”

Navigating Multi-Scale Cancer Systems Biology Towards Model-Driven Clinical Oncology and Its Applications in Personalized Therapeutics

“…Each pathway within a biomolecular network requires input cues from the extracellular environment for onward downstream signal transduction (133)(134)(135). In the case of cancer, the biomolecular milieu constituting the tumor microenvironment (TME) acts as a niche for tumor development, metastasis, as well as therapy response (136) (Figure 1E and Table S4).…”