2019
DOI: 10.1111/bph.14636
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Signalling in response to sub‐picomolar concentrations of active compounds: Pushing the boundaries of GPCR sensitivity

Abstract: There is evidence for ultra‐sensitive responses to active compounds at concentrations below picomolar levels by proteins and receptors found in species ranging from bacteria to mammals. We have recently shown that such ultra‐sensitivity is also demonstrated by a wide range of prototypical GPCRs, and we have determined the molecular mechanisms behind these responses for three family A GPCRs: the relaxin receptor, RXFP1; the β2‐adrenoceptor; and the M3 muscarinic ACh receptor. Interestingly, there are reports of… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 118 publications
(258 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…FPR2/ALX conformational changes were observed with an optimal ATL concentration of 100 pM, a 1,000‐fold less than that needed for receptor dimerization. The changes induced by such a low concentration of ligand can be easily overlooked when functional assays are used 55 . For example, several studies using Ca 2+ mobilization and other G protein‐dependent signaling pathways find no effect of LXA 4 on the stimulated cells, although batch variation of the ligand and its degradation may be contributing factors for the absence of agonistic activities 22-25 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…FPR2/ALX conformational changes were observed with an optimal ATL concentration of 100 pM, a 1,000‐fold less than that needed for receptor dimerization. The changes induced by such a low concentration of ligand can be easily overlooked when functional assays are used 55 . For example, several studies using Ca 2+ mobilization and other G protein‐dependent signaling pathways find no effect of LXA 4 on the stimulated cells, although batch variation of the ligand and its degradation may be contributing factors for the absence of agonistic activities 22-25 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The observed inhibition on WKYMVm‐stimulated IL‐8 release by low concentrations of ATL supports the notion that this action of ATL is functionally relevant. It is worth noting that GPCRs can be activated by sub‐picomolar concentrations of ligands 55 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…G proteins, including Gq, can exist as preassembled protein complexes with GPCRs, in which the receptor, G proteins and effectors exist in very close proximity to each other in the absence of ligand (Qin et al, 2011). This close proximity leads to the presence of "high affinity" receptors (Civciristov et al, 2018), in which the presence of a ligand leads to a rapid increase in signaling due to mechanisms that may include rebinding of ligand, increased ligand binding time and increased ligand sequestration/concentration (Dityatev and Schachner, 2006;Herbette et al, 1988; Disease Models & Mechanisms • DMM • Accepted manuscript Hrabetová and Nicholson, 2004;Kane et al, 2008;Sargent et al, 1988;Sykes et al, 2014;Vargová and Syková, 2008;Vauquelin and Charlton, 2010). These high affinity receptors can also respond to ultralow ligand concentrations (Civciristov et al, 2018).…”
Section: The Dominant Negative Mechanism Of Plcb4 Variantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This close proximity leads to the presence of "high affinity" receptors (Civciristov et al, 2018), in which the presence of a ligand leads to a rapid increase in signaling due to mechanisms that may include rebinding of ligand, increased ligand binding time and increased ligand sequestration/concentration (Dityatev and Schachner, 2006;Herbette et al, 1988; Disease Models & Mechanisms • DMM • Accepted manuscript Hrabetová and Nicholson, 2004;Kane et al, 2008;Sargent et al, 1988;Sykes et al, 2014;Vargová and Syková, 2008;Vauquelin and Charlton, 2010). These high affinity receptors can also respond to ultralow ligand concentrations (Civciristov et al, 2018). The remaining receptors that are not part of a preassembled complex are considered low affinity receptors and respond to high ligand concentrations (Civciristov et al, 2018).…”
Section: The Dominant Negative Mechanism Of Plcb4 Variantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most drugs acting on GPCRs do so in the nanomolar to micromolar concentration range. However, some receptors including the β 2 ‐adrenoceptor, the relaxin RXFP1 receptor, and M 3 muscarinic receptor can be activated by much lower, often sub‐picomolar, agonist concentrations, for instance, adrenaline at β 2 ‐adrenoceptors (Civciristov & Halls, ). It has long been known that effective agonist concentrations, particularly for endogenous full agonists such as adrenaline, are lower in some cell types due to the presence of non‐linear receptor–effector coupling, also known as spare receptors or a large receptor reserve.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%