2017
DOI: 10.1080/0163853x.2017.1379327
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Signalling of Coherence Relations in Discourse, Beyond Discourse Markers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
81
0
3

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(85 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
1
81
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The most crucial task in signaling annotation is the selection of signal types. The taxonomy of discourse signals used in this project is adapted from that of Das and Taboada (2017), with additional types and subtypes to better suit other genres. Two new types and four new subtypes of the existing types are proposed: the two new types are Visual and Textual in which the subtype of the former is Image and the subtypes of the latter are Title, Date, and Attribution.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The most crucial task in signaling annotation is the selection of signal types. The taxonomy of discourse signals used in this project is adapted from that of Das and Taboada (2017), with additional types and subtypes to better suit other genres. Two new types and four new subtypes of the existing types are proposed: the two new types are Visual and Textual in which the subtype of the former is Image and the subtypes of the latter are Title, Date, and Attribution.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rhetorical Structure Theory (RST, Mann and Thompson 1988) is a well-known theoretical framework that extensively investigates discourse relations and is adopted by Das and Taboada (2017) and the present study. RST is a functional theory of text organization that identifies hierarchical structure in text.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DMs are widely believed to be the most reliable signals of coherence relations. Accordingly, their role in discourse interpretation has been extensively studied both in (psycholinguistic) discourse processing (see Das [2014] for an overview) and computational discourse applications such as discourse parsing (Hernault et al, 2010;Lin et al, 2014), machine translation (Meyer et al, 2011), text summarization (Alonso i Alemany, 2005), or argumentation mining (Kirschner et al, 2015). This…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Danlos et al, 2018: 51) 3. The RST Signalling Corpus (Das et al, 2015) Furthermore, it has also been shown that on a great many occasions relations can simultaneously be indicated by multiple signals (Das, 2014;Das & Taboada, 2018b). In Example [7] from the RST Signalling Corpus (Das et al, 2015), the Circumstance relation between the text segments is signalled by three signals: (i) the DM "since", (ii) the change of tense between two clauses (simple past → present perfect), and (iii) an indicative phrase ("last December").…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dada la relevancia de estas relaciones, su indagación ostenta un lugar privilegiado tanto en los estudios del discurso como en aquellos psicolingüísticos centrados en la comprensión. En cuanto a los primeros, existe una extensa investigación en torno a sus tipos y cantidad (Grosz y Sidner, 1986;Mann y Thompson, 1988;Sanders, et al, 1992;Renkema, 2009;Da Cunha, Torres-Moreno & Sierra, 2011;Ibáñez, Moncada, y Santana, 2015) a nuevas metodologías para su anotación (Taboada y Das, 2013;Hoek, Evers-Vermeul, y Sanders, 2017;Scholman, Evers-Vermeul, y Sanders, 2016) y a los marcadores discursivos que las explicitan (Duque, 2014;2016;Santana, Nieuwenhuijsen, Spooren y Sanders, 2017;Taboada & Das, 2013;Das y Taboada, 2017;Taboada y Gómez-González, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified