Signalling Theory and Equilibrium in Strategic Management Research: An Assessment and a Research Agenda

Abstract

Actors within organizations commonly must make choices armed with incomplete and asymmetrically distributed information. Signalling theory seeks to explain how individuals are able to do so. This theory's primary predictive mechanism is ‘separating equilibrium’, which occurs when a signal's expectations are confirmed through experience. A content analysis finds that most strategic management signalling theory studies have not fully leveraged separating equilibrium. This presents two possible paths for future research. First, some researchers may wish to incorporate separating equilibrium. We illustrate how doing so can uncover new relationships, generate novel insights, and fortify the theory's application. Others who want to theorize about signals, but not examine separating equilibrium, could integrate ideas from signalling theory with other information perspectives. Here a signal becomes one stimulus among many that corporate actors interpret and act upon. We provide research agendas so strategy scholars can apply signalling theory most effectively to meet their research objectives.

Better Together? Signaling Interactions in New Venture Pursuit of Initial External Capital

“…These venture development organizations (VDOs) are typically entities that offer new firms a combination of concept evaluation, mentorship, networking assistance, and funding access in exchange for a client company fee (Renault, 2012). Because of their ability to understand what is important for firms to succeed, a relationship with a VDO serves as a meaningful signaling mechanism to outsiders (Bergh, Connelly, Ketchen, & Shannon, 2014). VDOs provide a number of resources critical for early-stage growth (Clouse & Austrian, 2013).…”

Network Positions and the Probability of Being Acquired: An Empirical Analysis in the Biopharmaceutical Industry

“…Building on signaling theory, an acquisition decision can be regarded as an information asymmetry problem (Bergh et al, 2014;Connelly et al, 2011;Spence, 1973Spence, , 2002. The predator -the acquiring firm -faces difficulty in assessing whether a possible prey has the quality it claims to possess.…”

Do cross-border mergers and acquisitions increase short-term market performance? The case of Chinese firms

“…This theory has been used in a variety of management literatures, including strategic management (Ozmel, Reuer, & Gulati, 2013;Priem, Li, & Carr, 2012;Reuer & Ragozzino, 2012), entrepreneurship (Ahlers, et al, 2015;Bergh, et al, 2014;Moss, Neubaum, & Meyskens, 2015), and human resource management (Lourenço, et al, 2014;Renwick, Redman, & Maguire, 2012).…”