2011
DOI: 10.1038/nmeth.1701
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SignalP 4.0: discriminating signal peptides from transmembrane regions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

49
6,306
1
59

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8,260 publications
(6,415 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
49
6,306
1
59
Order By: Relevance
“…Putative signal peptides and transmembrane domain(s) were predicted using the programs CD-Search tool [29] and SignalP [30]. …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Putative signal peptides and transmembrane domain(s) were predicted using the programs CD-Search tool [29] and SignalP [30]. …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The theoretical exoproteome of the eight Synechococcus strains used in the experimental study plus four Prochlorococcus strains (MED4, MIT9303, MIT9312 and MIT9313) and SAR11 ( Pelagibacter ubique HTCC1062) was determined based on three prediction tools: (i) the S ignal P 4.0 server for predicting N‐terminal signal peptides for secretion (Petersen et al ., 2011), (ii) the S ecretome P 2.0 server for predicting proteins exported by non‐classical systems (Bendtsen et al ., 2005) and (iii) the L ipo P server for predicting lipoproteins (Juncker et al ., 2003). PSORT b 3.0 was used to determine subcellular location of the proteins (Yu et al ., 2010).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, the application of refolding strategies to solubilize inclusion bodies, which were formed in significant amounts, were not successful. The key to success was finally to design E. coli optimized DNA sequences devoid of the inherent signal peptide15, 16 but including an N‐terminal His 6 ‐tag, which were expressed using E. coli Shuffle T7LysY as the expression host for promoting disulfide bond formation, and performing the expression in TB medium by a careful selection of the expression conditions. This approach finally led to clear detectable enzyme expression and up to 100‐fold improvement in activity per mg cell‐free extract when employing the natural substrates (Figure S1 and Table S6).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%