2022 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (CVPRW) 2022
DOI: 10.1109/cvprw56347.2022.00564
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Signature Detection, Restoration, and Verification: A Novel Chinese Document Signature Forgery Detection Benchmark

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2. This study [2] 7. In this study, [7] Tuncer et al propose a novel method for handwritten signature verification that combines a deep feature warehouse with an iterative Minimum Redundancy Maximum Relevance (MRMR) approach.…”
Section: Literature Surveymentioning
confidence: 78%
“…2. This study [2] 7. In this study, [7] Tuncer et al propose a novel method for handwritten signature verification that combines a deep feature warehouse with an iterative Minimum Redundancy Maximum Relevance (MRMR) approach.…”
Section: Literature Surveymentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Among a total of 260 users, 100 users wrote in Bengali and the other 160 ones wrote in Hindi, with 24 genuine signatures and 30 skilled forgeries per user. Yan et al [46] proposed ChiSig, a signature forgery detection benchmark that contains 10,242 samples from 102 users. In addition, there are two non-public Chinese signature datasets.…”
Section: (B) Offline Signature Datasetsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The offline handwriting images in the MSDS dataset are rendered on the acquisition devices while collecting online information, rather than being acquired by typically photographing or scanning (e.g. [15,46,44]). Therefore, the rendered handwriting may differ from the one written by pens in terms of tips, turning points, and thickness of the strokes, which may lead to changes in personal handwriting information.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%