2012
DOI: 10.1080/07380569.2012.658347
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Signature Pedagogy: A Literature Review of Social Studies and Technology Research

Abstract: A literature review of 121 peer-reviewed articles, books, and conference proceedings was conducted to determine the signature pedagogies of social studies education and technology integration. The authors found that the signature social studies pedagogy is based on two primary instructional models: direct-instruction and inquiry-based, student-centered learning. Technology can be used to support both models, although its potential lies more in enabling inquiry-based, student-centered learning. Future trends an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0
4

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
22
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The more student-centered approach to instruction seen in the PACT components can be challenging for teachers to successfully incorporate in K-12 classrooms (Beck & Eno, 2012). Additional research on assisting teachers in gaining facility with and sustaining this type of instruction is warranted given the consistent findings of more traditional types of instruction (e.g., lecture, note taking) that have persisted in the social studies (Bolinger & Warren, 2007;Chiodo & Byford, 2004;Paxton, 1999;Swanson et al, in press).…”
Section: Implications and Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The more student-centered approach to instruction seen in the PACT components can be challenging for teachers to successfully incorporate in K-12 classrooms (Beck & Eno, 2012). Additional research on assisting teachers in gaining facility with and sustaining this type of instruction is warranted given the consistent findings of more traditional types of instruction (e.g., lecture, note taking) that have persisted in the social studies (Bolinger & Warren, 2007;Chiodo & Byford, 2004;Paxton, 1999;Swanson et al, in press).…”
Section: Implications and Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Öğretmenler, genel olarak ders kitaplarına dayalı sınıf deneyimleri sunmayı ve öğrencilerine olguları aktarmayı amaçlayan yaklaşımları tercih etmektedir. Şaşırtıcı olarak bazı araştırmacılar (örn., Beck, & Eno 2012;Vogler, & Virtue, 2007) birçok sosyal bilgiler öğretmeninin geleneksel öğretim yöntemlerinin toplu miktarda bilgiyi aktarmak için en iyi uygulamalar olduğunu savunduğunu belirtmişlerdir. Ancak Kember'e (1997) göre bu tür bir öğretimde odak nokta öğretmenin sahip olduğu ilkeler, kavramlar veya olguların aktarımıdır ve öğrencilerin üst-bilişsel düşünme stratejileri kullanımı veya okudukları bir olgu hakkındaki bilişsel süreç ve öznel deneyimleri ya da kavramsallaştırmaları dikkate alınmaz.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…Thus, many teachers have succumbed to relying on the teacher-centered methods of instruction as a means of dealing with the depth versus breadth debate ( Additionally, many social studies educators rely heavily on textbooks, which promote fact-driven instruction but often neglect skill acquisition (Caron, 2005;Levstick, 2008;Misco & Patterson, 2009;Russell & Waters, 2010). In fact, Beck and Eno (2012) state that "textbook readings, lectures, and the memorization of textbooks" (p. 70-71) are the primary pedagogical activities in the social studies profession. They go on to state that there is a "significant gap" (p.…”
Section: Secondary Social Studies Teachers' Pedagogical Methods Of Inmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, Beck and Eno (2012) assert that "…student-centered learning, particularly in the form of inquiry, leads to a much deeper, authentic understanding of social studies issues [and content]" (p. 84).…”
Section: Secondary Social Studies Teachers' Pedagogical Methods Of Inmentioning
confidence: 99%