2015
DOI: 10.1103/physreve.91.050106
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Signatures of infinity: Nonergodicity and resource scaling in prediction, complexity, and learning

Abstract: We introduce a simple analysis of the structural complexity of infinite-memory processes built from random samples of stationary, ergodic finite-memory component processes. Such processes are familiar from the well known multiarm Bandit problem. We contrast our analysis with computation-theoretic and statistical inference approaches to understanding their complexity. The result is an alternative view of the relationship between predictability, complexity, and learning that highlights the distinct ways in which… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

5
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To close, let's return to our initial discussion of statistical signatures of structural organization. We drew a comparison of divergent memory in ergodic processes to that we previously identified in the so-called Bandit nonergodic processes [26]. The mechanism underlying the latter was rather straightforward: from trial to trial the process remembers the operant ergodic component subprocess and so uses an infinite memory and exhibits an excess entropy that diverges as log .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To close, let's return to our initial discussion of statistical signatures of structural organization. We drew a comparison of divergent memory in ergodic processes to that we previously identified in the so-called Bandit nonergodic processes [26]. The mechanism underlying the latter was rather straightforward: from trial to trial the process remembers the operant ergodic component subprocess and so uses an infinite memory and exhibits an excess entropy that diverges as log .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since strongly mixing processes have short memory and nonergodic processes could be said to have infinite memory [26], Ref. [20] proposed that one or another type of nonmixing property is a good candidate for long memory in ergodic stationary processes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another direction forward is to develop creation and annihilation operators within nondiagonalizable dynamics. In the study of complex stochastic information processing, for example, this would allow analytic study of infinitememory processes generated by, say, stochastic pushdown and counter automata [51,[80][81][82]. In a physical context, such operators may aid in the study of open quantum field theories.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ergodic decomposition of the entropy rate ( 45 ) states that a stationary process is asymptotically deterministic, i.e., , if and only if almost all its ergodic components are asymptotically deterministic, i.e., almost surely. In contrast, the ergodic decomposition of the excess entropy (46) states that a stationary process is infinitary, i.e., , if some of its ergodic components are infinitary, i.e., with a nonzero probability, or if , i.e., if the process is strongly nonergodic in particular, see [ 14 , 15 ].…”
Section: Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%