Signatures of Testing: On-Site Inspection Technologies

Zucca, J.J.; Carrigan, Charles R.; Goldstein, Peter; Jarpe, S.; Sweeney, J.J.; Pickles, W.L.; Wright, B.L.

doi:10.1007/978-94-011-0419-7_10

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Passive Seismic For Small Nuclear Tests1

Introduction1

Citation Types

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Year Published

1999

2024

Publication Types

Select...

Article5

Relationship

Self Cite0

Independent5

Authors

Journals

Cited by 5 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 2 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…56 Local seismographs placed within a few km of a nuclear explosion detect over 50 small aftershocks between magnitudes 1 and −2 after an explosion between magnitudes 4 and 5. Seismic detectors should be located in a quiet place, away from noisy machinery.…”

Section: Passive Seismic For Small Nuclear Testsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Progress in CTBT Monitoring Since its 1999 Senate Defeat

Hafemeister

2007

Science & Global Security

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Passive Seismic For Small Nuclear Testsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Progress in CTBT Monitoring Since its 1999 Senate Defeat

Hafemeister

2007

Science & Global Security

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Furthermore, conventional building and construction surveying activities in most cases require the equipment operators to physically enter the structure or site to be able to perform such activities. With considerations of safety, efficiency, approachability, and practicality, it is imperative to implement new technologies with less or no human labor at the site [15][16][17]. In response to this demand, different types of innovative devices have been developed during the last decade for construction surveying, such as robotic platforms [18,19].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

An Error Prediction Model for Construction Bulk Measurements Using a Customized Low-Cost UAS-LIDAR System

Guan

Huang²,

Wang³

et al. 2022

Drones

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Small unmanned aerial systems (UAS) have been increasingly popular in surveying and mapping tasks. While photogrammetry has been the primary UAS sensing technology in other industries, construction activities can also benefit from accurate surveying measurements from airborne LIDAR. This paper discusses a custom-designed low-cost UAS-based LIDAR system that can effectively measure construction excavation and bulk piles. The system is designed with open interfaces that can be easily upgraded and expanded. An error model was developed to predict the horizontal and vertical errors of single point geo-registration for a generic UAS-LIDAR. This model was validated for the proposed UAS-LIDAR system using calibration targets and real-world measurements from different scenarios. The results indicated random errors from LIDAR at approximately 0.1 m and systematic errors at or below centimeter level. Additional pre-processing of the raw point cloud can further reduce the random errors in LIDAR measurements of bulk piles.

show abstract

Additional Challenges for On-Site Inspection (OSI) in Tropics

Wickramasinghe,

De Silva

2024

Pure Appl. Geophys.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Signatures of Testing: On-Site Inspection Technologies

Cited by 5 publications

References 2 publications

Progress in CTBT Monitoring Since its 1999 Senate Defeat

Progress in CTBT Monitoring Since its 1999 Senate Defeat

An Error Prediction Model for Construction Bulk Measurements Using a Customized Low-Cost UAS-LIDAR System

Additional Challenges for On-Site Inspection (OSI) in Tropics

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About