2003
DOI: 10.2307/3211331
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Signed versus Unsigned Student Evaluations of Teaching: A Comparison

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
21
0
3

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
2
21
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The findings uncovered student's perceptions, showing a link between perceived age and approachability, perceived age and knowledge, and perceptions of females faculty and attractiveness. First, we found that age statistically significantly predicts knowledge that agrees with the findings of Fries and McNingh (2003) that concluded that experience might matter to students. ''[S]tudents gave instructors with less than 5 years of experience lower mean scores, more comments, and more critical comments than they did to instructors with more experience.''…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The findings uncovered student's perceptions, showing a link between perceived age and approachability, perceived age and knowledge, and perceptions of females faculty and attractiveness. First, we found that age statistically significantly predicts knowledge that agrees with the findings of Fries and McNingh (2003) that concluded that experience might matter to students. ''[S]tudents gave instructors with less than 5 years of experience lower mean scores, more comments, and more critical comments than they did to instructors with more experience.''…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Males in general, and White males specifically, were perceived as more knowledgeable than females, a fact that has been found in other literature. Fries and McNingh (2003) found that ''students rank female instructors consistently lower than their male counterparts in all categories while simultaneously giving a higher percentage of negative comments to their female instructors.'' (p.341).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In this study, the class sizes were between 15-18, the subject was English language, and the questionnaires were filled out anonymously. The higher ratings given were consistent with the results of previous research which indicates higher ratings based on subject (Humanities and Arts are rated more positively), class size (smaller classes give higher ratings) and anonymity (Braskamp & Ory, 1994;Davies et al, 2006;Fries & McNinch, 2003;Neumann, 2000;Worthington, 2002).…”
Section: International Journal Of Educationsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…A great many studies shows that anonymity has an effect on students' evaluations of teachers, and that non-anonymous methods result in higher ratings than anonymous ones (Fries &McNinch, 2003). Davies et al (2010) indicate that the purpose, the content and the type of surveys are important factors, and these vary from institution to institution, which might cause different interpretations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies addressing anonymity in self-rating in educational research to date mainly focus on students' evaluations of teaching or lecturer's performances (e.g. Fries and McNinch 2003;Opren 1980) or students' learning experience (e.g. Jessup, Connolly and Galegher 1990;Connolly, Jessup and Valacich 1990).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%