1971
DOI: 10.1080/00087114.1971.10796447
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Significance of Chromosome Numbers in Charophyta — A Discussion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1973
1973
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
(8 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Chromosome number studied in the four species confirmed the previous reports. Many workers reported 7 as the basic chromosome number for the genus Chara and 6 for the genus Nitella (Khan and Sarma 1967, Sinha and Verma 1970, Sarma and Ramjee 1971, Noor and Mukharjee 1977, Chartterjee 1979. The present findings also confirms above reports but many a times more than 7 in Chara spp.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chromosome number studied in the four species confirmed the previous reports. Many workers reported 7 as the basic chromosome number for the genus Chara and 6 for the genus Nitella (Khan and Sarma 1967, Sinha and Verma 1970, Sarma and Ramjee 1971, Noor and Mukharjee 1977, Chartterjee 1979. The present findings also confirms above reports but many a times more than 7 in Chara spp.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wood and Imahori (1965), while bringing up their Monograph and Iconograph on 'A Revision of the Characeae', considered that the sexual dimorphism reflects minor genetic variations and the dioecious taxa always possess half the chromosome number of its monoecious counterparts. This interpretation of Wood and Imahori (1965) was not supported by Sarma and Khan (1967), Sarma and Ramjee (1971), Sawa (1965), Proctor and Hotchkiss (1968); Ramjee and Bhatnagar (1978) and Bhatnagar (1981) on cytological grounds. Present paper deals with the correlation between polyploidy and sexual dimorphism in Charophyta.…”
mentioning
confidence: 84%